AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Tina Feiger

PSYC19 · PSYCH1 · PSY19 · PSYCH4464 · PSYCHDEV · PSYCH · PSYCH2996 · PSYCH19 · PHSIC19 · PSYCH4411 · PSYCHOLOGY19 · SMILING · 40 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you will read the dense text religiously and self-study; otherwise pick a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganized LecturesHard Test-Bank ExamsDense Textbook RequiredGuest SpeakersPolarizing
  • Lectures often described as scattered and unclear, so .
  • Exams and test bank and frequently feel mismatched to class discussion.
  • A minority praise guest speakers, passion for developmental psych, and , but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

An A usually demands heavy , and ; many report tough grading and mismatched tests.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Content is dense developmental psych with frequent specific exams and a toughest classes at SMC.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

, and she shows little flexibility for missed tests.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Strong praise for guest speakers and avoid-her warnings about disorganization and brutal tests.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

Students report , and hard specific scantron items with no curve.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Dense textbook reading, weekly or biweekly quizzes, essays, and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Many describe scattered unprepared lectures and , though some find her passionate with strong guest speakers.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Grade is driven , and final from a test bank, plus some papers and .

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

40 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person developmental psych feels dense and test-heavy; lectures are often scattered while guest speakers and help some students survive.

Main concern

Hard, ultra-specific exams and book.

What students said

“ . She grades unnecessarily strictly on written work, and like but the other choices seem right as well”
PSYCH19
“ ! They are all multiple choice, but extremely specific. She requires the NEWEST edition of books, but gives you absolutely no direction how to read the book itself.”
3251
“ . Lectures are useless & scattered. She's extremely unclear, & unhelpful.”
PSYCH19

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

the textbook or test bank and often feel disconnected from lectures.

Multiple Choice Test BankHighly Specific QuestionsBiweekly QuizzesHard Midterm and Final

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or book, very specific, and widely called unfairly hard.

Multiple Choice Test BankHighly Specific QuestionsHard Midterm and Final
“midterm and final are difficult, there is a little ”
PSYCH19
“ ! They are all multiple choice, but extremely specific.”
3251
“ . Her study guides are useless because of this.”
PSYCH4464

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Period.”

Voice snapshots generated from 40 in-person reviews, highlighting themes of , and mixed caring. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Teaching Clarity

36/100

“ . Lectures are useless & scattered. She's extremely unclear, & unhelpful.”

📝

35/100

“ ! They are all multiple choice, but extremely specific.”

👎 Recommendation

32/100

“ .”

🎤 Guest Speakers

70/100

“She brings in great guest lecturers!!! Definately a class worth taking”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Her lectures lack direction and are everywhere.
  • She talks about random things that does not relate to the class at all.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • A hard class!
  • Her class was one of the toughest class taken @SMC.
  • If you want an A you will have to study a lot of material.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character & Extras

  • This professor is a true treasure.
  • She really cares for her students.
  • , and activities that are helpful.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

40

Recent reviews read by the AI

40

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Forty detailed in-person reviews spanning many years show consistent themes of and disorganization despite some positive outliers.

Inside 40 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 57
3 out of 54
2 out of 510
1 out of 512

Course coverage

PSYCH1922 reviews
PSY193 reviews
32512 reviews
PSYC192 reviews
PSYCH29962 reviews
Show 8 more courses
PSYCH44642 reviews
PHSIC191 review
PSYCH1 review
PSYCH11 review
PSYCH44111 review
PSYCHDEV1 review
PSYCHOLOGY191 review
SMILING1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values