AI Rate Professor

Philosophy Social Sciences

Leemon McHenry

PHILOS10 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Take PHILOS10 if you want a rigorous, high-value bioethics course and will study for .

Best fit · Effort For RewardBioethics FocusGreat DebatesHard Exams With ReviewMedicine RelevantMust-Take Philosophy
  • Both reviewers rate him 5 and call the course vital and excellent.
  • Exams are hard but class reviews and debates help.
  • Especially strong for pre-med, nursing, or patients wanting bioethics literacy.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Students earned A and A- but call the , so an A still takes real study.

All evidence is in-person PHILOS10.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Difficulty 4 with and dense bioethics content is not light philosophy.

Difficulty evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

20/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

95/100

One calls it the ; both urge taking it when possible.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

High grades appear after hard exams with review support, not .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, and but not crushing load.

Format shift

Workload detail is limited to in-person comments.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Both students call him a really great professor with vital subject matter and good debates.

Format shift

Teaching praise is from two in-person PHILOS10 reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Two hard exams with in-class reviews are the standout assessments mentioned.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Two in-person PHILOS10 reviews praise a great professor, hard but , and rich debates on bioethics.

Main concern

and .

What students said

“Great course if you are going into medicine or nursing, but also if you are a patient and need to be better informed about bioethics.”
PHILOS10
“This was the . ... Take this class if you get a chance.”
PHILOS10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Two hard exams with class reviews; .

Two Hard ExamsIn-Class ReviewClass Debates

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

review for each and good class debates.

Two Hard ExamsIn-Class ReviewDebates
“ but there was a review for each one in class. Good class debates.”
PHILOS10

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This was the . (I have a BA and have therefore taken many classes) He's a really great professor and the subject matter is vital.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching value and . Credibility rating: Low.

⭐ Teaching Quality

92/100

“He's a really great professor and the subject matter is vital.”

🩺 Career Relevance

90/100

“Great course if you are going into medicine or nursing”

📝

48/100

“ but there was a review for each one in class.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching & Content

  • This was the .
  • the subject matter is vital.
  • Good class debates.

Theme 2

📈

  • but there was a review for each one in class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only two detailed but old reviews from one course limit breadth despite consistent high praise.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHILOS102 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values