AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Robert Flores

PHIL0001 · PHILO7ONL · PHLS1284 · PHILO1 · PHILSECT · PHIL001 · PHIL1ONLINE · PHILO7 · PHIL1 · PHILOSOPHY07 · PHILO2846 · PHILOSOPHY1 · PHILO01 · PHILOSOPY1 · PHIL7 · PHIL2806 · PHIL100 · PHYL1ONLINE · PHILOS1 · PHILOSOPHY · PHILO6 · PHIL07 · 60 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid if you can, especially online; only consider in person if you already like philosophy and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProNon-responsive emailsUnclear confusing testsOnline self-teach onlyOnly 100 points totalDisorganized instruction
  • Online sections draw near-unanimous avoid warnings for , and harsh 100-point grading.
  • some find him chill or and unhelpful.
  • Hard to recover after a because of and little feedback.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Many say only about 100 total points leave almost no room for error, and .

Online reviews are harsher on grade recovery; a few older .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Philosophy content plus unclear lectures or a typical intro.

Online evidence stresses self-teaching difficulty; in-person is mixed but .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

mandatory and others not clearly enforced.

Both formats lack a .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

The dominant message is run or positive in-person outliers.

Online ; in-person has a minority of positive takes.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Repeated complaints about a 100-point course total, no , and little chance to raise a low score.

Format shift

and still common in person.

Workload

Heavy

38/100

and high-stakes quizzes or exams with limited scaffolding make the .

Format shift

Online students stress self-study volume; and .

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

, and absent from discussion; a smaller group finds him energetic or chill on campus.

Format shift

Online teaching quality is consistently poor; in-person is mixed but net negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Grades hinge on quizzes, midterms, finals, and .

Format shift

Both formats center exams; online adds discussion posts that students call ignored.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

42 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

vibe for some and widespread complaints about confusion, organization, and harsh grading.

Main concern

, and hard recovery after mistakes.

What students said

“ and . .”
PHILOSOPHY
“The most confusingdisorganized professor I've ever had in college.”
PHILO1
“if easy.”
PHIL100

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe a read-the-book, teach-yourself course with unanswered emails, poor grammar on materials, and little instructor presence.

Main concern

No real teaching support and .

What students said

“Professor was non responsive to emails, not helpful at all making philosophy even harder than it is.”
2971
“you could hardly call it an "online" class, . Avoid if possible.”
PHILOS1
“Take the class if you love teaching yourself because you will be doing a lot of it.”
PHIL07

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and unforgiving, with so each miss hits hard.

Confusing vague questions100-point total courseT/F and multiple choiceLittle feedback or answer keys

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person tests are mixed but often described as reports of easy campus exams.

Vague multiple choicePop midtermsHigh-stakes point economy
“ . He uses the same ones every year, consisting of half T/F and half multiple choice. The and vague.”
PHILOS1
“ . Neve gave us instructions for anything we did”
PHILOSOPHY

Online

worded, and paired with almost no instructor clarification.

Poorly worded questionsNo email helpSelf-study tests
“AND so unclear! Half of them aren't even gramatically correct!”
PHILOS1
“impossible to get an A because there are only 100 points (his exams are difficult with too many spelling mistakes)”
PHLS1284

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Run dude ! RUN”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (8 online, 42 in , and format risk. Credibility rating: High.

🚫

22/100

“The online class experience was very poor and frustrating to say the least. AVOID!”

📧 Non-Responsive

28/100

“ , although he said email him directly for questions”

📉

24/100

“Only 100 points so know your material”

Theme 1

💻 About Online Classes

  • HE SHOULD NOT teach online class
  • you will be doing a lot of it
  • There's only 100 points TOTAL which makes it incredibly difficult to get an A

Theme 2

📉 About Teaching Quality

  • Useless. I took him for an online class, not helpful
  • Garbage professor, probably waiting it out for retirement

Theme 3

🙂 Minority Positive Takes

  • He's a cool guy, but you have to be interested in the material
  • Professor Flores is a
  • if easy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

60

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews with a and highly consistent negative themes make the pattern reliable.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 510
3 out of 56
2 out of 517
1 out of 521

Course coverage

PHIL18 reviews
PHILO17 reviews
PHILOS17 reviews
PHILO75 reviews
PHIL72 reviews
Show 20 more courses
PHILO7ONL2 reviews
13051 review
29481 review
29711 review
PHIL00011 review
PHIL0011 review
PHIL071 review
PHIL1001 review
PHIL1ONLINE1 review
PHIL28061 review
PHILO011 review
PHILO28461 review
PHILO61 review
PHILOSOPHY1 review
PHILOSOPHY071 review
PHILOSOPHY11 review
PHILOSOPY11 review
PHILSECT1 review
PHLS12841 review
PHYL1ONLINE1 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

3

B+ 1 · B 1 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No Grade 1