AI Rate Professor

Design Technology

Jamie Cavanaugh

GRDES65 · GRDES1445 · ET4097 · GD4239 · GD66 · GRDES67 · GRDES66 · ET14 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you already know web basics and ; skip if you need hand-holding or fear public critique.

Best fit · Self Taught ProIndustry ExperiencedOrganizedYouTube ResourcesSelf-Directed LearningProject Critiques
  • Strong industry insight and .
  • Expects prior HTML/CSS basics; and YouTube.
  • ; one student received an F after missing a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Doing the work usually works, but subjective critiques and a high-stakes presentation can still wreck the grade.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Web design fundamentals with real industry pace; not easy if you lack HTML/CSS basics.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

At least as mandatory; others do not contradict.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

Majority praise organization and industry value, but and one harsh F story pull some away.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Most say you do fine if you work, but and one missed presentation became an F.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Projects, reading, midterm and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

; some feel she under-teaches basics.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Heavy emphasis on projects, design critiques, and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Mostly praised as organized and industry-savvy with video resources, but some say and grading can be harsh or subjective.

Main concern

Presentation requirement and subjective design .

What students said

“You basically have to learn on your own and spend time watching videos. Youtube saved my life with this class!”
GRDES66
“This professor is one of the . The class is not easy but you really learn a lot if you do the work.”
GRDES66
“ ... She gave me a F for the class.”
GD66

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on midterm and sit-down exams.

Project critiquesFinal presentationMidterm critique

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and ; missing the present can fail the course.

Midterm critiqueFinal presentationProject-based
“I wasn't able to present because of my anxiety. She gave me a F for the class.”
GD66
“ .”
GRDES66

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Organized and really knows web design. Provides lots of outside resources that help with the class including videos.”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 , and critique risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ and . Her industry experience and insight is a real bonus.”

📚

48/100

“Does not really teach you the html and css that is used. You basically have to learn on your own”

⚠️ Grade Risk

52/100

“ and fuzzy one. So if you need a good grade, think again before enrolling.”

👍 Recommendation

68/100

“This professor is one of the . The class is not easy but you really learn a lot if you do the work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she has YouTube videos that she makes

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The class is not easy but you really learn a lot
  • and fuzzy
  • She gave me a F for the class

Theme 3

💼 About Industry Focus

  • Very professional & in touch with current web design trends
  • she's very CORPORATE
  • Her industry experience and insight is a real bonus

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

13 in-person reviews spanning 2008-2015 with mixed but detailed and largely consistent themes on organization and self-study.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 57
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

GRDES664 reviews
GD662 reviews
GRDES672 reviews
ET141 review
ET40971 review
Show 3 more courses
GD42391 review
GRDES14451 review
GRDES651 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values