AI Rate Professor

Social Science

Rook Campbell

PHILOS52 · POLSCI3 · PHILOS523049 · POLISCI52 · POLSCI52 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.6

The decision

if and are willing to cite thoroughly and stay on top of readings.

Best fit · Effort For RewardBrilliant LecturerExtremely ApproachableCite EverythingEngaging DiscussionsKnowledge Seeker Friendly
  • Students call her brilliant, approachable, and one of the .
  • Do the , and cite every claim to earn a strong grade.
  • Material can be demanding but lectures are interesting and participation is valued.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Students report that timely readings and complete, fully cited work lead to As without extreme struggle.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content can be difficult and citation-heavy, but and interesting enough that prepared students succeed.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

82/100

; others stress preparation over seat time.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

90/100

Multiple students highly recommend her for brilliant lectures, approachability, and real help with hard material.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

Grades reward complete, on-time work, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Readings, papers, and careful citations create a steady but manageable load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

Students repeatedly call her excellent, approachable, and highly helpful with difficult material.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Success centers on papers, readings, and on-time .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person classes are praised as interesting and , and rigorous citation.

Main concern

Strict citation expectations on papers can surprise students who already know the material.

What students said

“By far one of the .”
POLSCI52
“ and you will get an A.”
PHILOS52
“she wants you to cite EVERYTHING in your papers.”
POLSCI3

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize papers and citation .

Paper-Based AssessmentStrict Citation

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and on-time work rather than detailed exam security.

Paper-Based AssessmentStrict Citation
“she wants you to cite EVERYTHING in your papers.”
POLSCI3
“ and you will get an A.”
PHILOS52

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“By far one of the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews, highlighting teaching quality, citation demands, and grade paths. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“Excellent Professor. lectures are very interesting. .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

90/100

“I think she is brilliant and .”

📝 Citation Demands

68/100

“she wants you to cite EVERYTHING in your papers.”

📈 Path to an A

78/100

“ and you will get an A.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Excellent Professor. Very interesting lectures.
  • , and ACTUALLY willing to assist you
  • Awesome Professor with very good lectures.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The material is difficult,but equally as interesting.
  • and turn your work on time and it will be a breeze.
  • cite EVERYTHING in your papers.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Perfect for knowledge seekers.
  • She is a very good professor.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed, consistent in-person reviews support a , but the sample is small and mostly from 2013-2015.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHILOS521 review
PHILOS5230491 review
POLISCI521 review
POLSCI31 review
POLSCI521 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Pass 1