AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Toni Randall

EGLISH · ENG1 · ESL2083 · ENG2007 · ENG01 · ESL21A · ESL2239 · ENGLI1 · ESL20A · ESL2095 · ESL282095 · ESL20B · ENGLISH · ENGLISH1 · ESL23 · 78 lifetime ratings

AI rating
36/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want a rigorous English workout and ; otherwise pick another professor.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy WorkloadTough GraderPolarizingStrict GrammarLots of Reading
  • Workload is extremely heavy with daily summaries, annotations, many books, and research papers.
  • and unforgiving on grammar and assignment format.
  • Student opinions split sharply between those who learned a lot and those who found her unfair or unhelpful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A , and near-perfect grammar with little room for error.

Both the few online and and heavy effort for high marks.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Content is dense ESL and English 1 material with , and research writing.

Difficulty is described as high mainly in in-person ENG1 and ESL reviews; online sample is too small to contradict that.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as mandatory and the course is built around constant assignments.

; online comments barely discuss attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Many students explicitly say not to take her , and poor help, outweighing a minority of strong fans.

; online is split one good and one strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

Students report zeroed summaries for minor similarity, harsh grammar standards, and grades that feel unfair.

Format shift

and ESL reviews.

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

, and research papers dominate student complaints.

Format shift

Overwhelming workload is the dominant in-person theme; online reviews also note quizzes and work.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

and real writing growth, while many call her unclear, unhelpful, or the .

Format shift

Polarized quality is strongest in in-person reviews spanning many years.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

, and papers more than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Assignment-heavy structure is described mainly for in-person ENG1 and ESL.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

48 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, and a polarizing classroom style; dedicated writers sometimes thrive while many call her unfair or boring.

Main concern

and writing for ENG1/ESL with and little help.

What students said

“I've never ever had such a horrible teacher in my entire life. Too much HW.No Help. Not fair.”
ESL282095
“ .. simply TOO TOO TOO much work!”
ENG1
“There is no easy A in this class, but it is achievable as 6 of us did so with a lot of hard work and effort.”
ENG1

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

one student praised her teaching style and and strongly advised against her vocabulary course.

Main concern

and little sense of support in the weaker online review.

What students said

“Very good professor! Her goal is to expand student's knowledge, and she does it in a very effective way.”
ESL20B
“Bad teacher, I hoped , but in reality it not.”
ESL2095

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear in some sections but day-to-day writing assignments drive the .

Weekly exams mentionedGrammar-focusedAssignment-heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and focus on homework and papers instead.

Homework drivenResearch papersHarsh written grading
“I did 50 pages summary and only 1 sentence of my summary was similar to the book and she gave me zero for that summary.”
ENG1

Online

One online review notes weekly exams and .

Weekly examsTimed assignment windows
“ and She gave you a week to turn in ”
ESL2083

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I've never ever had such a horrible teacher in my entire life. Too much HW.No Help. Not fair. Don't even think about her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting workload, grading strictness, and polarized teaching views. Credibility rating: High.

📚 Crushing Workload

18/100

“ .. simply TOO TOO TOO much work!”

⚖️

28/100

“she is so .i strongly suggest .”

🎯 Polarized Teaching

45/100

“If you want to improve your writing AND critical thinking skills then do yourself a favor and .”

👍 Low Recommendation

32/100

“ ! I learned nothing from her. taking her class is wasting time and money.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Didn't like her teaching style at all!!! Very bad teacher!!!
  • She cares about her students and that is why she wants her students to be perfect and successful.
  • she never really TEACHES

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • There is no easy A in this class, but it is achievable as 6 of us did so with a lot of hard work and effort.
  • Easy D :D
  • Definitely NOT an easy A.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Too much HW.No Help. Not fair.
  • Gives 2 many hw
  • millions of work! way above ENG 1!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

78

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years with rich detail and consistent themes on workload and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 523
4 out of 57
3 out of 58
2 out of 518
1 out of 522

Course coverage

ENG127 reviews
ESL21A7 reviews
ENGLI12 reviews
ENGLISH12 reviews
EGLISH1 review
Show 10 more courses
ENG011 review
ENG20071 review
ENGLISH1 review
ESL20831 review
ESL20951 review
ESL20A1 review
ESL20B1 review
ESL22391 review
ESL231 review
ESL2820951 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values