Jaime Scholnick

FASH2 · FSHN9 · FASHN2132 · ART501 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 52/100
RMP rating: 3.6/5
Take again: —
Difficulty: 2.2

The decision

if and accept that grading may feel personal rather than purely objective.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing PersonalitySubjective GradingExtra Credit AvailableAttendance MattersMixed Fashion Studio

Reviews and claims of favoritism-based grading.
Older and ; later comments call her discouraging and particular.
; studio work and showing up matter more than a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

54/100

and lower difficulty ratings help, but later reviews say grades hinge on whether she likes your work, not pure effort.

; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

Average difficulty sits low and positive reviewers treat content as burner.

; there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Depends

48/100

and call her the , while later students actively warn others away.

; there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some mention and niceness, but others say grades depend on personal like and harsh critiques.

Format shift

Workload

Light

70/100

Comments focus on studio vibe and .

Format shift

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Three five-star take-her reviews sit against two low-quality complaints about discouragement and favoritism.

Format shift

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Fashion and and critiques rather than formal exams.

Format shift

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person fashion and art studio comments range from take-her enthusiasm with to complaints that she grades by liking the student rather than the work.

Main concern

Perceived favoritism and discouraging critiques can tank the experience even when the course is not extremely hard.

What students said

“Awesome teacher. and helpful. Important to show up. Will give .”
FSHN9

“ . She is only nice to those she likes and will grade depending on if she likes your work”
ART501

“Smile face, but grade sh*t. She is so particular and ”
FASHN2132

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe midterms, finals, proctoring, or open-book rules.

Little Exam Detail

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments emphasize studio grading and .

Little Exam DetailStudio Critique Focus

“Important to show up. Will give .”
FSHN9

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“ . She is only nice to those she likes and will grade depending on if she likes your work, whether it was good or not.”
Voice snapshots generated from 5 in-person reviews spanning 2007-2014, highlighting split praise versus favoritism concerns. Credibility rating: Low.

🎭 Polarizing Experience

48/100

“Awesome teacher. and helpful. Important to show up. Will give . I had a blast in her class (9A) and learned a lot. !”

⚖️

48/100

“ and will grade depending on if she likes your work, whether it was good or not.”

😊 Surface Niceness vs Grades

40/100

“Smile face, but grade sh*t. She is so particular and ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

GREAT TEACHER , VERY NICE AND HELPFULL. THE SO FAR.
Awesome teacher. and helpful.
She was more discouraging .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

Will give .
Smile face, but grade sh*t.
grade depending on if she likes your work, whether it was good or not.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

34/100

Evidence confidence

Only five mostly old reviews (2007-2014) with no grades and highly split tone limit confidence.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53

4 out of 50

3 out of 50

2 out of 52

1 out of 50

Course coverage

FASH22 reviews

ART5011 review

FASHN21321 review

FSHN91 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values

Jaime Scholnick

x x if x x x x x x and accept that grading may feel personal rather than purely objective.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

FairEffort

Beginner

Recommended

Depends

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎭 Polarizing Experience

⚖️ x x x

😊 Surface Niceness vs Grades

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

if and accept that grading may feel personal rather than purely objective.

⚖️