AI Rate Professor

Physical Sciences

Kevin Grazier

ATRON4 · ASTRONOMY1 · ASTRO4 · ASTRO1 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
22/100
RMP rating
2.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

if you already know physics basics and ; most students say avoid.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTalks Too FastArrogantHard ExamsNASA ExpertCurve Saves Some
  • Lectures move extremely fast and assume physics background many students lack.
  • Exams are hard and often feel disconnected from notes; a .
  • Strong NASA credentials and real expertise, but many students call him arrogant and advise avoiding.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Tests are brutal and many warn of failing; a if you crush the midterm and final.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

No-prereq astro still assumes physics fluency and moves too fast for most beginners.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

Students say you must attend lectures to keep up; but useful for tests.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Majority urge avoiding due to arrogance, unfair grades, and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

but many report unfair Ds and .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Optional , and labs; .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Deep NASA expertise but rapid speech, assumed background, and low student care dominate reviews.

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

74/100

Grades hinge on hard midterms, quizzes, and .

Format shift

All evidence from in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person astronomy lectures are fast, content-heavy, and exam-focused; many students feel lost and report .

Main concern

Pace and attend.

What students said

“He speaks a mile a minute and assumes that everyone has knowledge of physics”
ASTRO4
“ . Full of himself and does not care about his students.”
ASTRO1
“You will learn A LOT. This guy is super smart. He used to work for NASA”
ASTRONOMY1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In-person exams are difficult short-answer style; that only helps strong performers.

Hard Midterm and FinalShort AnswerCurve on Final GradeTests Not Always From Notes

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Hard midterm, quizzes, and ; first tests often fail most of the class; .

Hard Midterm and FinalShort AnswerClass-Wide Low ScoresCurve
“the first test more than 60% of the class got below a 50%”
ASTRO4
“ on his website”
ASTRO4
“1 midterm, quizzes and final”
ASTRONOMY1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ UNLESS YOU WANT TO FAIL !!! EVER !!!!”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 in-person reviews spanning 2009-2014, , and attitude. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚀 Real Expertise

70/100

“Works for NASA, and flies one of their spacecraft over Saturn. Extremely educated individual.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

22/100

“Avoid if at all possible. Narcissistic, useless and to be honest, I really don't know why he is teaching.”

📝

32/100

“ ?'s- u really need to know the material.”

🗣️ Teaching Pace

28/100

“Talks way too fast and on his website.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He speaks a mile a minute and assumes that everyone has knowledge of physics
  • His lectures were very engaging. Be prepared to write quickly
  • Kinda arrogant but he is actually pretty cool! DONT BE INTIMIDATED!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • the first test more than 60% of the class got below a 50%
  • I did good on the exam but still got a D for the class
  • Save yourself and .-Your GPA may suffer

Theme 3

💔 About Character

  • Full of himself and does not care about his students
  • Arrogant and full of himself
  • Narcissistic, useless

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve mostly detailed reviews from 2009-2014 with consistent complaints about pace and exams, but all old and only one reported grade.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ASTRO48 reviews
ASTRO12 reviews
ASTRONOMY11 review
ATRON41 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values