AI Rate Professor

Art

Yumi Kiyose

ART52A · ART52B · ART1113 · ART10A · ART61AB5184 · CERAM4470 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take her if and will ask questions often; avoid if .

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing communicatorProject-heavy art loadBeginner materials helpInsanely nice when clearExpensive art supplies
  • Many praise her as inspiring and .
  • Others slam last-minute changes, poor communication, and redoing work after misunderstandings.
  • Art projects and materials make the load time-intensive and sometimes costly.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

, but miscommunication and rework make the A far from free.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Art content itself is beginner-friendly with and can feel demanding.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Strong praise for inspiration and kindness is offset by communication and workload complaints.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Students say , but misunderstandings sometimes cost points.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Multiple reviews cite lots of assignments, long studio hours, and expensive materials.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

62/100

Some call her amazing and inspiring; others call communication bad and changes last-minute.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Studio projects and materials work dominate; lectures and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, while others struggle with , and costly materials.

Main concern

Communication gaps and last-minute changes can force redos and inflate workload.

What students said

“Yumi was a great teacher and inspired me to further my art practice.”
ART10A
“Expect 10 hours of labor intensive but ”
ART10A
“If .”
ART10A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Evaluation centers on art projects and studio work rather than formal proctored exams.

Project-based assessmentStudio homeworkNo traditional exams mentioned

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews describe project-driven art assessment with little mention of formal exams.

Project-based assessmentStudio homework
“Don't expect a lecture, read, and .”
ART10A
“If .”
ART10A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“JUST TAKE HER CLASS. and she doesn't give pressure on homework or art projects. If .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person reviews, highlighting inspiration, communication friction, and project workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

62/100

“Yumi was a great teacher and inspired me to further my art practice.”

⚠️ Communication Risk

35/100

“Bad communication. Often leads to misunderstandings.”

📦 Workload Reality

32/100

“Expect 10 hours of labor intensive but ”

🅰️ Grade Path

58/100

“If .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Most amazing teacher ever! she makes everything fun
  • as long as you ask
  • , and accommodates anyone and everyone

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Work

  • The class requires a lot of work, but all art classes are time intensive
  • Expect 10 hours of labor intensive but
  • If .

Theme 3

💬 About Communication

  • Bad communication. Often leads to misunderstandings.
  • She has a very difficult time communicating but .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews spanning several years show consistent themes but opinions split sharply positive and negative.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ART10A5 reviews
ART52B2 reviews
ART11131 review
ART52A1 review
ART61AB51841 review
Show 1 more courses
CERAM44701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values