AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Dan Nannini

COUNS · COUNS123 · COUNS1 · HUMANITY · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
1.3

The decision

Approach with caution for high-stakes transfer planning; double-check major-path advice yourself.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTransfer Counseling FocusMixed Advice QualityLow Course DifficultyPolarized FeedbackSparse Detail
  • some call him cool and .
  • One detailed complaint blames bad transfer advice that derailed a science path.
  • Course difficulty is low, but counseling impact and sparse comments limit trust.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Difficulty ratings are very low with no hard-work signals, so a high grade looks easy.

.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

85/100

Counseling content is rated very easy across reviews.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Some students love him while others give low marks or report harmful transfer guidance.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

60/100

; course difficulty is low but grade outcomes are not reported.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

80/100

Low difficulty scores and short positive comments imply light course load.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Praise for being cool and awesome is offset by a serious transfer-advice failure and a 1-star review.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews center on counseling and class vibe rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person counseling reviews range from highly and a 1-star no-comment rating.

Main concern

Mixed guidance quality; one student reports lasting harm from transfer advice.

What students said

“Dan Nannini is a counselor who kindly but mistakenly encouraged me to transfer into UC Berkeley in Liberal Arts because of my straight A's then transfer into Science.”
COUNS123
“Very cool teacher and counselor. .”
HUMANITY
“Awesome!”
COUNS1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

No clear exam format is described in counseling-focused reviews.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Dan Nannini is a counselor who kindly but mistakenly encouraged me to transfer into UC Berkeley in Liberal Arts because of my straight A's then transfer into Science.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews, highlighting polarized counseling outcomes. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Advising Risk

30/100

“It did not work and I was never able to get on track in the sciences.”

👍 Positive Support

70/100

“Very cool teacher and counselor. .”

🎯 Teaching Experience

50/100

“Awesome!”

📉 Polarized Rating

20/100

“No Comments”

Theme 1

🧭 About Transfer Advice

  • kindly but mistakenly encouraged me to transfer into UC Berkeley in Liberal Arts
  • I should have stayed at SMC another year as I suggested
  • never able to get on track in the sciences

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • Very cool teacher and counselor
  • Awesome!
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Four sparse reviews spanning many years, mixed quality, and limited academic detail reduce confidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

COUNS1 review
COUNS11 review
COUNS1231 review
HUMANITY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values