AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Fran Manion

MATH · MATH8 · MATH3100 · MATH81047 · MATH81 · MATH20 · MATH07 · MATH15 · MATH2541 · MATH31 · MATH32 · MATH41 · MATH7 · MATH52 · 37 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if and can handle uneven organization and mood.

Best fit · Effort For RewardPolarizing PersonalityDisorganized at TimesPatient ExplainerHeavy HomeworkFair Exams If You Study
  • Reviews and mean disorganized experiences.
  • and attending carefully is the common path to fair grades.
  • Some students love her foundation teaching while and harsh.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some get As with homework and review while others need real study and get no pity without it.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Math content is often tough, though several students say the teacher makes it manageable.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Strong praise for clarity and patience and confusion.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Exams are often described as fair and , but some report no mercy without solid study.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

, and time-consuming prep.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

while others cite confusion, poor time management, and harsh tone.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework plus multiple exams and a .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

37 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Highly polarized math instruction ranging from clear and , and unhelpful.

Main concern

Personality clashes, organization issues, and .

What students said

“Ms. Manion is a great math teacher simply because .”
MATH81
“Makes empty promises, v. . ”
MATH20
“Her class is easy if you do the HW.”
MATH15

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and book problems, with some reports of dropped lowest scores and a .

Exams From HomeworkDrops Lowest TestComprehensive FinalFair If You Study

Assessment risk

Standard

58/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe fair homework-based exams, occasional dropped lowest scores, and a .

Exams From HomeworkDrops Lowest TestComprehensive Final
“ . Do and understand the problems in the book and you will do well on the exams.”
MATH15
“ . i didnt do 1 hw the whole semester & still got A.”
MATH41
“ , so don't expect any surprises.”
MATH15

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just come to class, LISTEN, ask questions, do the work, and you'll get your A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 37 in-person reviews, highlighting polarized teaching and workload themes. Credibility rating: High.

⚖️ Polarizing Teaching

50/100

“Horrible teacher, no help whatsoever, cant understand at all! boring class and no review for ! AVOID!”

📚

55/100

“Her class is easy if you do the HW.”

⏳ Organization Issues

35/100

“Nice but disorganized. Can't budget time.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • Makes empty promises, v. .confusing
  • She lectures straight from the book

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • !!!Even sometimes I did not do the
  • you have to really study and get the good grade or she won't pity you

Theme 3

😤 About Personality

  • she is mean
  • Beware!!!! Evil, she
  • The kindest person alive and she does know how to teach.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

37

Recent reviews read by the AI

37

Lifetime ratings

74/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-seven detailed reviews spanning many years show a consistent polarized pattern despite older dates.

Inside 37 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 516
4 out of 53
3 out of 55
2 out of 53
1 out of 510

Course coverage

MATH329 reviews
MATH314 reviews
MATH414 reviews
MATH74 reviews
MATH153 reviews
Show 9 more courses
MATH072 reviews
MATH202 reviews
MATH82 reviews
MATH812 reviews
MATH1 review
MATH25411 review
MATH31001 review
MATH521 review
MATH810471 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values