AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Poblet I C

ESL2213 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

; reviews describe an irresponsible teaching disaster.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNo responsibilityStrict attendanceUnmarked homeworkSudden quitMass dropout
  • Students report zero sense of teaching responsibility and harsh lateness policies.
  • Heavy questionnaires were assigned then left ungraded, driving most students away.
  • Instructor abruptly left the role mid-term after about 1.5 months.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

15/100

but not graded, and the instructor quit mid-course, so earning an A is effectively unsupported.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

Students rated difficulty 5/5 with intense short-deadline questionnaires that emptied the class.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Even five minutes late was marked absent, indicating a .

Evidence .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The sole review condemns lack of responsibility, ungraded work, mass dropout, and a mid-term quit.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Assigned heavy questionnaires were never graded and absences were marked for minor lateness.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students were told to complete many questionnaires for 12 people within 1.5 days.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

8/100

Reviewer says the instructor had no sense of responsibility, lost most of the class, and quit after 1.5 months.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Assessment centered on many questionnaires and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One old in-person ESL review paints a harsh, irresponsible instructor who marked absences for minor lateness, piled on ungraded questionnaires, lost most of the class, then quit mid-term.

Main concern

Unreliable instructor who may abandon the class and fail to grade assigned work.

What students said

“She has NO sense of responsibility as a teacher. And even if 5min late, she marked absent.”
ESL2213
“She suddenly quit her job only 1.5month and go UC Irvine as an ESL teacher”
ESL2213

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; only ungraded questionnaires and .

“She gave many questionnaires to ask 12ppl within 1.5 days. But this HWs were not graded.”
ESL2213

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She has NO sense of responsibility as a teacher. And even if 5min late, she marked absent.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting responsibility failures and . Credibility rating: Low.

💔 Teaching Responsibility

8/100

“She has NO sense of responsibility as a teacher. And even if 5min late, she marked absent.”

📉 Class Collapse

10/100

“At beginning, class was full, after this, almost 2/3 students didn't come.”

🚪 Mid-Term Exit

5/100

“She suddenly quit her job only 1.5month and go UC Irvine as an ESL teacher”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has NO sense of responsibility as a teacher.
  • She suddenly quit her job only 1.5month

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She gave many questionnaires to ask 12ppl within 1.5 days. But this HWs were not graded.
  • even if 5min late, she marked absent

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one detailed but very old 2012 review exists, so conclusions rest on a single voice.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ESL22131 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values