AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jenny Kotlerman

MATH32 · MATH84 · MATH20 · MATH52 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

if you are strong in math and and homework.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHit-or-Miss ExplainerAccent BarrierWeekly QuizzesNo Office HoursHard Tests
  • some call her a great .
  • Accent and limited office hours are recurring complaints.
  • Homework and weekly quizzes matter; hard work can still yield an A in stats.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

38/100

Some students earn As with and quiz prep, but and others warn you may not pass.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Stats and geometry feel hard, with weekly quizzes and .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

; quizzes at the start of class imply showing up matters.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Roughly half love her stats teaching while others strongly advise avoiding her for clarity and attitude issues.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and another got an A with hard work, but as hard.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Weekly quiz prep and ; not featherlight but not described as overwhelming for most.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

58/100

Quality scores average mid-range with praise for expertise and fairness offset by confusion and condescension.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework, start-of-class quizzes, and exams all figure into the course.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

many praise her stats expertise and fairness, while others , and an unhelpful attitude.

Main concern

Accent, limited office hours, and inconsistent clarity make some students struggle early.

What students said

“If you do the homework and work hard you will get an A.”
MATH52
“ if you want to pass this class.”
MATH32
“Crappy Teacher. Has an attitude. Very condescending, arrogant, and unhelpful.”
MATH52

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and ; friendliness is average rather than open-book style.

In-person quizzesHard testsEarly exam

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Quizzes at the start of class and as early as the third session.

Weekly quizzesHard testsEarly exam
“She gives quizes in the beginning of each class.”
MATH52
“ her accent is hard to understand.”
MATH52
“ accent, hard to understand.”
MATH32

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you do the homework and work hard you will get an A.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person reviews (2004-2007), highlighting teaching polarization and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

58/100

“I found professor Kotlerman to be one of the .”

⚠️ Polarized Experience

40/100

“ IF YOU KNOW WHAT'S GOOD FOR YOU!”

📚 Effort Required

38/100

“Take this class if you are good in math and you are ready to work hard once a week (to prepare for the quiz).”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she made this dead subject alive and clear

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If you do the homework and work hard you will get an A.
  • I felt that she graded quite fairly.

Theme 3

🗣️ About Accent & Access

  • her accent is hard to understand
  • No office hours
  • will help you in class, before and after is you ask.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven detailed but very old (2004-2007) in-person reviews with mixed polarity and little grade data.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 54
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH526 reviews
MATH323 reviews
MATH201 review
MATH841 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values