AI Rate Professor

Dance

Carla Reed

DANCE22 · DANCE20 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
1.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Avoid unless you already learn dance well by watching and can tolerate a harsh, self-centered instructor.

Best fit · Self Taught ProSelf-AbsorbedHarsh CriticPoor ExplainerTalks Too MuchLow Student Focus
  • Most students describe her as rude, self-focused, and uninterested in teaching.
  • , so students must copy movements with little guidance.
  • One milder review says the visual challenge can help dancers who already care about the craft.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

No free-A talk appears; difficulty and harsh criticism make high grades feel effortful and uncertain.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Students struggle and report a tough, high-criticism classroom.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

available reviews.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Two of three reviews strongly warn against her, citing rudeness and almost no real teaching.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

Students describe constant criticism and a harsh .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Load is not detailed, but class time is spent more on talk and critique than productive dancing for some.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

22/100

Majority , and shows little interest in student learning.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

40/100

Reviews emphasize in-class movement and critique rather than formal exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person flamenco and dance students mostly report arrogance, weak teaching, and constant criticism, with one partial positive about visual challenge.

Main concern

Instructor focus on herself, poor verbal instruction, and harsh criticism.

What students said

“Self-absorbed and rude. She is so into herself and her own talent, even to the has almost zero interest in teaching her students.”
DANCE22
“She is too into her own personal issues to give a damn about your interest in Flamenco.”
DANCE20
“It takes some concentration to mimic her movements, as she doesn't describe them adequately, but if you're into dance, it's a good challenge”
DANCE20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format or proctoring for dance courses.

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Self-absorbed and rude. She is so into herself and her own talent, even to the has almost zero interest in teaching her students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 in-person reviews, highlighting weak teaching and harsh tone. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

22/100

“she has almost zero interest in teaching her students.”

👎 Classroom Tone

20/100

“She was sometimes a ball of anger, contantly spitting criticism!!!”

👀 Instruction Clarity

35/100

“ instructors”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • almost zero interest in teaching her students
  • She needs to stop talking and allow people to dance in the class
  • she doesn't describe them adequately

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • Self-absorbed and rude
  • I found her harsh and catty as well
  • She was sometimes a ball of anger, contantly spitting criticism!!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

30/100

Evidence confidence

Only three older reviews with limited grade detail, but the negative teaching complaints are fairly consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

DANCE202 reviews
DANCE221 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values