AI Rate Professor

Earth Science

Eugene Tademaru

PHYS22 · PHY23 · PHYSICS21 · PHY22 · PHYS21 · PHYSICS · PHYSICS23 · PHYSC22 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless you already know the math and can teach yourself physics from the book.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear lecturesAggressive curverBrutal examsKnows physics not teachingHigh drop rate
  • Students widely say he knows physics but .
  • Exams are hard and .
  • and occasional soften grades but many still struggle or drop.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Curves and help, but and studying often does not pay off without strong prior math.

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Physics content is treated as advanced, lectures assume untaught math, and .

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

; office hours help if you seek him out, but lectures themselves are often called useless.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students urge avoiding him because poor teaching and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and some , but exams stay hard and grades still feel precarious.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

and ; not described as light or overwhelming alone.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Repeated theme is subject mastery without clear explanations, useful lectures, or .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

and lectures.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person physics classes with , and frequent complaints that half the ; curves and office hours are the main safety nets.

Main concern

Teaching style makes standard physics feel unlearnable and GPA-risky.

What students said

“He cannot teach! This guy complicates the already complicated subject of Physics.”
PHYS21
“Horrible professor, disgusting teaching style, and brutal exams.”
PHYS22
“The lectures are incomprehensible, the the test.”
PHYSICS21

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are standard-to-brutal concept .

Harder than textbookStandard concepts but poorly taughtCurve on final

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as hard, sometimes disconnected from homework, with aggressive curving afterward.

Brutal examsHarder than examplesAggressive curve
“ .”
PHYS22
“His problems were harder than example&problem in the text.”
PHY22

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He cannot teach! This guy complicates the already complicated subject of Physics.”

Voice snapshots generated from 17 in-person , and curves. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

28/100

“ . he thinks that we should already know so many things that we haven't learned yet.”

⚠️

32/100

“Horrible professor, disgusting teaching style, and brutal exams.”

📈

55/100

“kinda hard class. you have to work hard he has office hours you can see him on. ”

👎 Recommendation

28/100

“SMC please get rid of this guy!! He cannot teach!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He cannot teach! This guy complicates the already complicated subject of Physics.
  • The lectures are incomprehensible
  • his teaching skills are no better then someone who never took teaching lessons

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • .
  • The only class I've ever taken where studying never paid off.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Nice as a person, definitively knows well stuuf that he is teaching, but he is a bad teacher.
  • He's knowledgable proffessor no doubt,and a

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

17

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Seventeen detailed in-person reviews spanning 2005-2010 show consistent complaints about teaching clarity despite age of data.

Inside 17 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 56

Course coverage

PHYS213 reviews
PHYSICS213 reviews
PHYSICS233 reviews
PHY222 reviews
PHY232 reviews
Show 3 more courses
PHYS222 reviews
PHYSC221 review
PHYSICS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values