AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Plotner J R

ESL2159 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are ready to teach yourself the material; the and pacing unhelpful.

Best fit · Self Taught ProUnclear ExplanationsSelf-Study HeavyPoor Time ManagementDisappointing
  • Single review reports unclear teaching and .
  • Student felt time was wasted because .
  • Very low sample size makes this a weak but clearly negative signal.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

No grade data, but the student felt learning depended on self-study rather than guided instruction for a fair A.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

Difficulty rating was moderate, but the .

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The single review .

All .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

The only reviewer was very disappointed and felt the class wasted time.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

; assessment fairness is unproven.

Format shift

All .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Assignments exist and , but volume is not described as overwhelming.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

25/100

Student says explanations are unclear and new material is not taught before assignments.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Review emphasizes assignments and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One ESL student felt the instructor could not explain clearly, assigned work without teaching new material, and mismanaged class time.

Main concern

Unclear explanations and .

What students said

“I am very, very disappointed with this professor. Wanted to receive knowledge, but I feel like wasting my time. She can? .”
ESL2159

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I am very, very disappointed with this professor. Wanted to receive knowledge, but I feel like wasting my time. She can? .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 in-person review with limited detail. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

25/100

“She can? . She gives assignments without rewiring a new material relaying on self-studying.”

⏱️ Class Pacing

20/100

“In addition, she can?t manage time. Too much time on one question!!”

👎 Recommendation

20/100

“I am very, very disappointed with this professor.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She can?
  • self-studying
  • she can?t manage time

Theme 2

📈 About Learning Outcomes

  • Wanted to receive knowledge, but I feel like wasting my time
  • Too much time on one question!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

18/100

Evidence confidence

Only one 2010 review exists, so patterns cannot be confirmed despite a .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ESL21591 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values