AI Rate Professor

English As A Second Language

Anne York-Herjeczki

ESLENGL · ESLESL · ESL0000 · ESL14 · ESL21A · ESL666 · ESL2033 · ESL11B · ESL17 · ESL21B · EE111 · 18 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

Skip unless and accept a .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPolarized reviewsUnclear and disorganizedStrict on gradesHard to earn an AHit-or-miss ESL experience
  • Reviews split sharply between early praise and later warnings of .
  • Getting an A is repeatedly described as .
  • , and a waste of time for ESL progress.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

Several students say an A is hard to get and she is strict on papers, though a .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is mixed in challenge, but unclear teaching and ESL should.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, so flexibility cannot be confirmed from reviews.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

A large share of comments , and little learning.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Students repeatedly say she is strict, hard for an A, and unforgiving on essay expectations.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Papers and follow-her-rules work come up often, so the load is more than light for many ESL students.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Comments split, but , and little actual teaching.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Papers and written work dominate student concerns more than exams.

Format shift

; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person ESL students report a highly polarized experience, with and others saying she teaches little and .

Main concern

, and weak skill growth for many learners.

What students said

“This teacher is not good at all, keeps changing everythings she said. ”
ESL21A
“She is useless and very strict teacher. if u need a good grade”
ESLENGL
“She is THE . in SMC. Also her class is easy A class if ”
ESL21A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a standard exam setup and .

Essay heavyUnclear expectations

Assessment risk

Varies

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; students mainly stress papers and .

Essay heavyUnclear expectations
“The only thing that matters to her are the ”
ESL21A
“the meaning of her essay not very clear, also get 80% on essaies...hurts grade”
ESL21B

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is so take esl class than take her, doesnt teach anything”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 in-person reviews spanning 2008-2010, highlighting polarized teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

👎 Recommendation Risk

32/100

“I . .”

📉 Teaching Clarity

38/100

“ do, you'll learn anything from her”

📝 Hard A Reality

34/100

“although itz really hard 2 gt an 'A' from her”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • doesnt teach anything
  • her class is very boring and she doesnt give a

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • getting A is difficult
  • if u need a good grade
  • easy A class if

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is a
  • She is a really nice teacher
  • She is THE . in SMC

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

18

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

but opinions are highly polarized and many lack grade or attendance detail.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ESL21A7 reviews
ESL20332 reviews
EE1111 review
ESL00001 review
ESL11B1 review
Show 6 more courses
ESL141 review
ESL171 review
ESL21B1 review
ESL6661 review
ESLENGL1 review
ESLESL1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values