AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Audrey Roche

ACCT02ONLINE · ACCTG2 · ACCOUNTING2 · ACCT2 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Avoid unless and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedUnclear LecturesHard ExamsSelf-Study HeavyAvoid
  • Many .
  • materials.
  • ; a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

, but hard midterms and .

All evidence is from the 11 in-person-labeled reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Fast-paced accounting content with difficult exams and .

All evidence is from the 11 in-person-labeled reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, so .

All evidence is from the 11 in-person-labeled reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

, and exam trouble outweigh scattered positives.

All evidence is from the 11 in-person-labeled reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Some report lenient homework and ; .

Format shift

All evidence is from the 11 in-person-labeled reviews.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Lots of , and consistency needed; weekends off means stay on top of work.

Format shift

All evidence is from the 11 in-person-labeled reviews.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Many call lectures unclear, boring, or and slow email replies.

Format shift

All evidence is from the 11 in-person-labeled reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Homework and materials matter, but and .

Format shift

All evidence is from the 11 in-person-labeled reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Mostly negative in-person (and hybrid-labeled) accounting experience: , and lots of self-study.

Main concern

and weak lecture support.

What students said

“Would highly recommend not taking her - very poor instruction/teaching.”
ACCT02ONLINE
“Ms. . She failed to complete things when she said she would.”
ACCT2
“HARD mid-term and FINAL. Takes weekends off stay on top of it, do the work be consistent and you will do well.”
ACCTG2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; one older note mentions open-book exams.

Hard MidtermHard FinalOpen-Book Mentioned OncePractice Final Mismatch

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Hard midterms and finals dominate; one student said open-book exams helped with B-problems, another said the .

Hard MidtermHard FinalOpen-Book ExamsUnfair Final
“HARD mid-term and FINAL.”
ACCTG2
“ and a disaster.”
ACCT2
“having the ”
ACCTG2

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Would highly recommend not taking her - very poor instruction/teaching.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 in-person-labeled reviews spanning 2003-2010, highlighting teaching clarity, exams, and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

30/100

“Lectures are very unclear - uses Excel spreadsheets with calculations and .”

🚫 Recommendation

32/100

“ .”

📝

32/100

“Midterm was very difficult - class average was 60% and highest grade was 81%.”

📚

32/100

“Lots of self study work. Provides lots of material for reference, lenient with HW.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • her "lectures" are pretty much a joke
  • and has zero pationt for students

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • HARD mid-term and FINAL
  • , but fair
  • she is very lenient in

Theme 3

⚠️ About Red Flags

  • instructional materials (examples) that were WRONG
  • Was misled for final
  • Avoid.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven detailed but older reviews (2003-2010) with consistent negative teaching themes; no recent sample.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ACCT26 reviews
ACCTG23 reviews
ACCOUNTING21 review
ACCT02ONLINE1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values