AI Rate Professor

Counseling

Thelma Valverde

COUNS20 · HIST101 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

; treat ratings as unreliable until more reviews appear.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHelpfulThin ReviewsMixed RatingsCounseling
  • Only two reviews, one empty and one focused more on appearance than academics.
  • The substantive comment calls her helpful and a good teacher.
  • Credibility is too low for strong course-planning decisions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe grading or the real effort needed for an A.

All evidence is from the 2 in-person reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

One review rates difficulty mid-high, the empty review rates it low; .

All evidence is from the 2 in-person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

All evidence is from the 2 in-person reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

and one empty 1-star leave little solid guidance.

All evidence is from the 2 in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

.

Format shift

All evidence is from the 2 in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload is not described in the available comments.

Format shift

All evidence is from the 2 in-person reviews.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Called helpful and a good teacher in the only substantive review, with no teaching detail otherwise.

Format shift

All evidence is from the 2 in-person reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews .

Format shift

All evidence is from the 2 in-person reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and a good teacher; the other has no comment.

Main concern

Almost no academic detail and polarized quality scores.

What students said

“ and a good teacher but it's hard to pay attention with a teacher this hot”
COUNS20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Reviews .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ and a good teacher but it's hard to pay attention with a teacher this hot”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 thin in-person reviews with almost no academic detail. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Mention

52/100

“ and a good teacher”

⚠️ Thin Evidence

20/100

“No Comments”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching

  • and a good teacher
  • No Comments

Theme 2

📉 About Data Limits

  • and who has an eye for beautiful women
  • No Comments

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

20/100

Evidence confidence

Two reviews from 2010, one empty and one low-substance, give very weak evidence.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

COUNS201 review
HIST1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values