AI Rate Professor

Kinesiology

Marcus Kowal

KINPE41W · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Expect an energetic PE instructor, but verify current expectations because reviews are thin and outdated.

Best fit · Effort For RewardEnthusiasticKinesiology PEMixed ReviewsLimited Detail
  • Only two brief reviews exist for the same PE course.
  • One student praises great enthusiasm; the other left no comment with a middling 3/5.
  • Too .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Difficulty sits at a moderate 3 with no grade outcomes or easy-A language in the comments.

.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Both reviews list difficulty 3 and give almost no content detail.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

One strong positive quality rating and one average rating with .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

strictness.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Reviews do not describe homework or practice load beyond standard PE difficulty ratings.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Average quality is and one average silent rating.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

No comment details how grades .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person KINPE41W reviews are sparse: one praises enthusiasm, one is blank with average quality.

Main concern

.

What students said

“Great enthusiasm!”
KINPE41W
“No Comments”
KINPE41W

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews .

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

details.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Great enthusiasm!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 sparse in-person reviews. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

68/100

“Great enthusiasm!”

📊 Limited Evidence

25/100

“No Comments”

👍 Recommendation Rate

58/100

“Great enthusiasm!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Great enthusiasm!
  • No Comments

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Course DIFFICULTY rating: 3
  • Professor QUALITY rating: 5

Theme 3

⚠️ About Data Gaps

  • No Comments
  • Not provided

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Only two 2009 reviews, one with no comment text, so confidence in any fine-grained claim is low.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

KINPE41W2 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values