AI Rate Professor

English

M Lamar Hawkins

ENG2013 · AET103 · ENG1999 · ENG21A · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
86/100
RMP rating
4.3/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.2

The decision

Take her for English if you want a .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyEngaging and kindAllows essay rewritesSimple weekly essaysKooky humorStudent-focused help
  • Most students praise her as kind, helpful, and engaging in English classes.
  • and she often lets students revise for a higher grade.
  • One older outlier calls her ridiculous and crazy in a non-English course.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

and lenient late-work policy make a high grade reachable with modest effort.

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

English content is described as simple and engaging rather than conceptually hard.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

, though she pushes participation and can put unprepared students on the spot.

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

80/100

Most students strongly recommend her for English, with one sharp negative outlier outside core writing classes.

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students note easy essays, late work accepted, and rewrite options for higher grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

76/100

Typical load is .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

83/100

Praised as kind, engaging, and invested in student writing, aside from one harsh outlier.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment centers on weekly essays and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and low-stress, with and rewrite chances; one non-English review is strongly negative.

Main concern

Personality can feel kooky or intense to a minority of students.

What students said

“ , but they're very simple. She also lets you turn in papers again if you want a higher grade.”
ENG21A
“ , and makes sure the students learn.”
ENG1999
“RIDICULOUS!!!! SERIOSULY CRAZY TEACHER”
AET103

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize essays more than formal exams, so .

Essay-focused assessmentLimited exam detail

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and rewrites rather than proctored tests.

Weekly essaysRewrite options
“ , but they're very simple.”
ENG21A
“Accepts late work, very lenient. .”
ENG21A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , but they're very simple. She also lets you turn in papers again if you want a higher grade. ”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 in-person reviews (2008-2009), , and one outlier. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

83/100

“She puts herself out there for the students... kind, helpful, and makes sure the students learn.”

📝

84/100

“ . Doesn't trip on you at all.”

👍 Recommendation

80/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • engaging style that is never boring
  • her kookiness wins me over, love her dry sense of humor
  • tries to get everyone to participate

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • , but they're very simple
  • lets you turn in papers again if you want a higher grade
  • Accepts late work, very lenient

Theme 3

⚠️ Minority Concerns

  • can come off as a little crazy sometimes
  • RIDICULOUS!!!! SERIOSULY CRAZY TEACHER

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Six detailed but very old (2008-2009) in-person reviews are mostly consistent, with .

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 54
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG21A3 reviews
AET1031 review
ENG19991 review
ENG20131 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values