AI Rate Professor

Social Science

Lynda Rush

ECON1 · ECONO01 · ECONECON · ECON01 · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating
24/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid unless you already know economics and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard TestsHigh Drop RateCannot TeachNice but IneffectiveExam-Heavy
  • Students widely report she cannot teach intro econ clearly despite being a .
  • , with high drop rates (70-80%).
  • Early positive reviews exist, but most .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Hard challenging tests, lost grades, and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

Intro econ is treated as fast-paced and expected.

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

26/100

Most students say because she cannot teach and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

, and cheating hurting the curve make grades feel punitive.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

and occasional group work rather than endless homework.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Repeated comments say she is nice but .

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

and a , and little emphasis on collected homework.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

lectures often called a waste of , and mass drops.

Main concern

and weak teaching lead to failing or withdrawing even strong students.

What students said

“Lectures are a waste of time and .”
ECON1
“70% of our class dropped...and its an intro class...”
ECON01
“She cannot teach, she loses test grades, she .”
ECON01

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are repeatedly described as very hard and misaligned with lectures, driving high failure and drops.

Hard Scantron TestsDrop One of Three ExamsExams Harder Than Lectures

Assessment risk

Strict

32/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a ; students say exams are much harder than lectures and scantrons are sometimes lost.

Hard Scantron TestsDrop One of Three ExamsExams Harder Than Lectures
“she will occasionally loses student's scantrons”
ECON1
“Her lectures are soo easy to grasp, but she screws students over in the exam.”
ECON1
“She drops 1 test out of 3, but .”
ECON01

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor cannot teach. She's a , and seems to care about her students--but she simply does not know how to teach an intro class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 12 in-person reviews (2008-2009), highlighting weak teaching and . Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

30/100

“Lectures are a waste of time and .”

🚫 Recommendation

26/100

“terrible teacher, and . !”

📝 Brutal Exams

32/100

“She drops 1 test out of 3, but . 70% of our class dropped...and its an intro class...”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures are a waste of time and .
  • Seems like an okay person, but she definitely couldn't teach our class.
  • her explanations are textbook without further classroom elaboration

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • 70% of our class dropped...and its an intro class...
  • She drops 1 test out of 3, but .
  • have the class failed the 2nd test!

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She's a , and seems to care about her students
  • As a and smart.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

12

Recent reviews read by the AI

12

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Twelve detailed in-person reviews from 2008-2009 and weak teaching, but they are old and lack recent confirmation.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 54
3 out of 52
2 out of 55
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ECON17 reviews
ECON013 reviews
ECONECON1 review
ECONO011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values