Bob Stockero

AUTO112 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 62/100
RMP rating: 3.9/5
Take again: 100%
Difficulty: 3.8

The decision

Consider him for serious auto training if you act professionally, but treat the rating as uncertain because evidence is sparse and dated.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHands-on auto instructorExpects maturityKnows enginesSparse reviewsTough on unprofessional students

Recent students describe him as a strong, professional automotive instructor who teaches a lot.
Older reviews are thin and mixed, including one serious harassment allegation from 2010.
Sample size is only four reviews, so confidence stays low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

50/100

One recent A+ and comments about real work suggest grades come with effort, not .

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

38/100

Difficulty ratings and work-to-learn comments point to a demanding technical auto course.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

The .

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

70/100

and call him a great instructor, but the tiny sample and one harsh negative cut confidence.

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

; the tone suggests firm standards for immature behavior rather than free grades.

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Comments say expect to work and learn a ton in a technical auto setting.

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

Most comments praise instruction and content knowledge, offset by one severe old complaint.

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly break out exam versus assignment weight for AUTO112.

Format shift

All evidence is in person; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

All reviews are in person for AUTO112: three praise teaching and engine knowledge, one older review alleges classroom harassment.

Main concern

Very small, mostly old sample plus one severe negative claim limits trust.

What students said

“if you're mature and professional he is an incredible instructor.”
AUTO112

“Great teacher and knows engine performance very well.”
AUTO112

“He was harassing me all the quarter saying in front of other students that I am stealing his money”
AUTO112

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or testing tools.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“Expect to work and learn a .”
Voice snapshots generated from 4 in-person reviews with low sample depth. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“Bob is a great professor, he can be tough on the students that act like children but if you're mature and professional he is an incredible instructor.”

🔧 Subject Expertise

75/100

“Great teacher and knows engine performance very well.”

⚠️ Credibility Warning

32/100

“HORRIBLE school and teachers are harassing students!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching

if you're mature and professional he is an incredible instructor.
Great teacher and knows engine performance very well.
Mr. , and he has a hot body!

Theme 2

⚠️ About Concerns

He was harassing me all the quarter saying in front of other students that I am stealing his money

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

32/100

Evidence confidence

Only four reviews, mostly old and short, with conflicting extremes make the profile weakly supported.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53

4 out of 50

3 out of 50

2 out of 50

1 out of 51

Course coverage

AUTO1124 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

A+ 1

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values