AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Christopher Kramer

PHIL101 · PHIL111 · PHIL206 · PHIL100H · PHIL203 · PHIL100 · 182 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
91.21%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if and are willing to write carefully for fair but not free grades.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHilarious lecturesGives good feedbackCaring and accessibleGet ready to readEssay-heavy exams
  • Students overwhelmingly call him hilarious, engaging, and one of the .
  • and discussions, but most who put in the work earn A or A-.
  • Online sections are flexible and writing-heavy; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

Most students earn A or A- with solid notes, readings, and careful essays, but discussions and reflections are graded strictly and .

Online and in-person both report manageable As if you write carefully; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

, though some readings and abstract ideas still require real thinking.

Online students sometimes find ; in-person humor makes concepts easier.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

; many in-person sections mark attendance mandatory or strongly reward being present for jokes and hints.

online is largely flexible, while .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

91/100

About 91% would take again, with , and real learning.

Recommendation is strong in both formats; several online students still wish they had taken him in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

64/100

Tough on discussions and essay polish, but overall fair with , and high A rates.

Format shift

; online essays draw more pickiness comments.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Weekly readings, discussions, quizzes, and overwhelming.

Format shift

Online writing load is heavier for some; and participation expectations.

Teaching experience

Excellent

89/100

Hilarious, knowledgeable lectures and strong student support define the experience, with only a small minority calling him rambling or harsh.

Format shift

; online quality still high via recorded lectures and one-on-one help.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

, and short-essay exams rather than a single high-stakes format.

Format shift

Online leans essay-exam heavy; exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

27 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students rave about stand-up-level humor, engaging lectures, and inspiration to learn philosophy, with manageable reading and fair overall outcomes.

Main concern

A minority find lectures rambling or ; attendance is often expected.

What students said

“Best professor I've ever had. Learned a lot and was able to .”
PHIL100H
“Kramer is literally one of the funniest people I have ever met in my entire life.”
PHIL100H
“The and not timed and can use notes and readings etc. No proctorio watching over you either.”
PHIL206

Remote format

Online

23 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online sections feature recorded , and lots of writing; many prefer the humor of live class but still recommend him online.

Main concern

Long pre-recorded lectures can wander, and .

What students said

“ and pretty AI proof, But grades fairly.”
PHIL100
“Prof Kramer is probably MORE interactive and teacher I have had in person.”
PHIL111
“3 Exams (all written). Easy quizzes (2 attempts/takes average scores).”
PHIL100

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

online tests that reward notes and lectures more than proctoring stress.

Essay examsOpen notes or untimed online examsQuizzes with multiple attemptsAI-proof writing focusNo Proctorio mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews often mention online untimed open-note exams or short-answer quizzes; .

Online untimed open-note examsShort answer quizzesStudy guidesNotes allowed
“The and not timed and can use notes and readings etc. No proctorio watching over you either.”
PHIL206
“ and , so pretty easy.”
PHIL100

Online

Online reviews describe , and AI-resistant writing with .

All essay examsEasy quizzes with 2 attemptsAI-proof writingQuizlets sometimes helpful
“ and pretty AI proof, But grades fairly.”
PHIL100
“Easy quizzes (2 attempts/takes average scores). .”
PHIL100

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews spanning online and , and grading fairness. Credibility rating: High.

😂 Teaching Personality

89/100

“Kramer is literally one of the funniest people I have ever met in my entire life.”

👍 Recommendation Strength

91/100

“Excellent class. . You will enjoy it, get a lot out of it, and he makes sure you do well”

📝

64/100

“he can be a bit of a so keep that in mind, but he always gives detailed reasons why.”

✍️ Workload Style

58/100

“Lots of and preps for the bigger stuff.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Funniest professor I've ever had
  • lectures funny a "shite" as Kramer might say
  • Super funny guy, always tried to keep us interested

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • getting an A is manageable
  • not hard to get an A even though some of the
  • if you show up you can get an A

Theme 3

❤️ About Support & Care

  • He made sure I passed
  • Allows late work often with no penalty

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

182

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty detailed recent reviews across online and , and writing-based assessment.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5155
4 out of 514
3 out of 54
2 out of 54
1 out of 55

Course coverage

PHIL11124 reviews
PHIL10014 reviews
PHIL100H5 reviews
PHIL2063 reviews
PHIL1012 reviews
Show 1 more courses
PHIL2032 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

45 reported outcomes

A range

40

A+ 3 · A 22 · A- 15

B range

4

B 4

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1