AI Rate Professor

Architecture

Armando Arias Del Cid

DRFT121 · DRAFT130 · DRFT101 · DRFT132 · ENG131 · 17 lifetime ratings

AI rating
42/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
38.46%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if and ask questions constantly; otherwise seek another CAD section.

Best fit · Self Taught ProAutoCAD expertHarsh zero-late policyHands-on labsPolarizing supportProject heavy
  • Strong AutoCAD knowledge and
  • Harsh zero-credit late policy and inconsistent or
  • Success depends on asking questions and putting in CAD practice outside lecture

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

As are possible with heavy CAD practice and questions, but late work gets zero and .

; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

AutoCAD projects demand hands-on practice beyond lectures, which many .

; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

Attendance is mandatory in some sections and optional in others; .

; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

; praise exists but many warn about attitude and .

; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

28/100

, and reports of inconsistent or .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Many CAD assignments and projects require substantial lab practice beyond class lectures.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Expert content knowledge, but delivery and and vague.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Projects and CAD work dominate; reviews.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

18 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Hands-on CAD courses where engaged students learn a lot, but many report uncaring attitude and .

Main concern

Zero late credit, vague answers, and feeling he only helps favored or architecture-track students.

What students said

“If you put in the time and communicate with your professor you can get an A.”
DRAFT130
“Armando is extremely uncaring and makes you feel like he wants you to fail.”
DRAFT130
“He creates a hostile, unforgiving environment.”
DRFT101

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

exams, with few or open-book tests noted.

Project basedFew testsOpen book quizzes mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and CAD assignments, with limited easy or open-book testing.

Project basedFew testsOpen book
“A .”
DRFT121
“you .”
DRAFT130

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Armando is extremely uncaring and makes you feel like he wants you to fail.”

Voice snapshots generated from 18 in-person reviews, highlighting CAD expertise versus harsh support and late policy. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Armando is an authority on the subject matter and .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

38/100

“ if you want to learn how to use design programs.”

⚖️

28/100

“Do not turn in anything late, you get zero credit.”

🛠️ Hands-on Learning

70/100

“If you do the work and ask questions you will learn the basics of AutoCAD.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very knowledgeable in AutoCAD
  • Answers can be vague or unavailable

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of CAD assignments
  • Zero late credit
  • A if you put in time and communicate

Theme 3

⚠️ About Support Climate

  • Helpful if you seek him out
  • Hostile or uncaring to others
  • Computer issues get little sympathy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

18

Recent reviews read by the AI

17

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

18 polarized in-person reviews over many years; but sample is moderate.

Inside 18 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 58

Course coverage

DRAFT13010 reviews
DRFT1012 reviews
DRFT1212 reviews
DRFT1322 reviews
1321 review
Show 1 more courses
ENG1311 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

13 reported outcomes

A range

7

A+ 2 · A 5

B range

2

B 2

C range

4

C+ 1 · C 2 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values