AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Jamie Campbell

MATH220 · MATH200 · MATH160 · MATH137138 · MATH150 · MATH137 · MATH150C · MATH107 · 121 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
27.59%
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid unless you are already strong in math and ready for ; switch professors if you can.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerBrutal examsTest heavyNotation pedanticSelf-study requiredLow pass rates
  • and are widely called unfairly hard with low averages
  • ; and perfect notation
  • Online and ; many urge avoiding him if possible

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

As require exceptional mastery; , and often have sub-50% averages.

Both online and ; .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

Content pace, skipped steps, and most students.

Consistent difficulty across formats.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

, and hybrid or online still force show-up for exams.

Online can be more flexible for lectures but not for exams.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

and repeated run-away warnings outweigh a minority of hardcore success stories.

Both formats largely discourage enrollment unless no alternative exists.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

credit, and unforgiving exam scoring.

Format shift

and in person.

Workload

Heavy

22/100

Copious accuracy-graded homework plus intensive exam prep, often 15-20+ hours weekly for some.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Strong math knowledge but frequent complaints of , and skipped steps.

Format shift

A minority of advanced students praise rigor; most find teaching ineffective.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

88/100

Exams commonly weigh 50-85% of the grade, with and practice tests poorly aligned.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

, harsh notation grading, and frequent fail rates.

Main concern

averages and little partial credit.

What students said

“class averages of 30-40%, everyone drops, impossible to prepare for his test”
MATH150
“ , and count for 85%.”
MATH200
“ !! He is very condescending toward students”
MATH137

Remote format

Online

16 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online and hybrid sections still demand self-study from videos and .

Main concern

steps.

What students said

“Lectures all recorded and , but .”
MATH220
“He forces his .”
MATH137138
“Basically paid to from material online.”
MATH137138

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

High-stakes, strict, low-average exams dominate, with little partial credit and harsh notation rules.

Test heavyIn-person examsNo cheat sheetsPedantic notation

Assessment risk

Strict

18/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and often far harder than practice or homework.

Frequent examsLow class averagesHarsh grading
“class averages of 30-40%, everyone drops, impossible to prepare for his test”
MATH150
“ , and count for 85%.”
MATH200

Online

Online students report recorded lectures but and low partial credit.

In-person exams for online classTest heavyStrict notation
“Lectures all recorded and , but .”
MATH220
“Even though its an online class .”
MATH137138

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“class averages of 30-40%, everyone drops, impossible to prepare for his test”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews (16 online, 34 in and . Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“ , and useless to learning the material.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“ .”

📝

12/100

“ , and count for 85%.”

⚖️

15/100

“He is a . if possible.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Skips key steps in lectures
  • Condescending and pedantic on notation
  • Strong math knowledge but poor for beginners

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • but low weight

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • Hours of work for modest grades

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

121

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews across online and in person with highly consistent themes of and teaching friction.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 529
4 out of 515
3 out of 524
2 out of 524
1 out of 529

Course coverage

MATH22013 reviews
MATH13713810 reviews
MATH1508 reviews
MATH1377 reviews
MATH2006 reviews
Show 3 more courses
MATH1604 reviews
MATH1071 review
MATH150C1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

46 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 2 · A 7

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 3 · B- 1

C range

6

C+ 1 · C 4 · C- 1

D range

1

D- 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

23

Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Incomplete 6 · Not sure yet 9 · Rather not say 5