AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Andrea Haupt

POLS121 · GLST102 · GLBST102 · POL121 · GLST101 · POSCI121 · POLS · POLS101 · 163 lifetime ratings

AI rating
68/100
RMP rating
3.8/5
Take again
66.37%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if you will read carefully and cite thoroughly; skip if you want a low-stress gen-ed.

Best fit · Effort For RewardReading-heavy politicsStrict citation rulesProctored online examsOrganized modulesExtra credit available
  • and current-event relevant but packed with readings and notes.
  • and strictness concerns.
  • High As are reachable with citations, study guides, and if you stay on top of work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

56/100

Many earn As with readings, citations, and , but harsh citation standards and As.

Online often has open-note elements yet strict proctoring; and notes.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is college-level politics with substantial reading; not a brain-burner for majors but heavy for casual gen-ed seekers.

GLST sections feel easier than POLS101/121 for many students.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

42/100

, while online is more flexible but still has scheduled proctored exams.

Online flexibility ; in-person attendance is frequently mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

66/100

and organization, tempered by grading and proctoring complaints.

Online ; in-person leans more positive for engaged students.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Clear rubrics and help, but citation perfectionism and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

, and several exams create moderate-to-heavy weekly load without pure busywork.

Format shift

Summer online compresses multiple major assessments into short windows.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

, and often engaging with current events, though some find lectures dry or biased.

Format shift

Online organization is a strength; in-person passion draws strong praise.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of quizzes, discussion posts, essays, and exams.

Format shift

Online leans slightly more exam-and-essay; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person sections feel fast and , but many call her passionate, accommodating, and fair with support materials.

Main concern

and rushed lectures can overwhelm non-majors seeking a light IGETC class.

What students said

“LOTS of reading assignments. You're assigned a good 3-4 at home readings before every class”
POLS121
“Dr. Haupt is an amazing professor. She provides you all the materials you need to succeed in her class”
POLS101
“she does give out so and videos throughout the semester.”
POLS121

Remote format

Online

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

Online students like clear Canvas structure and current politics content, but , and proctored exams.

Main concern

and piled end-of-term assessments plus citation nitpicking.

What students said

“ . Study a little, pay attention to citations in and then it's an easy A.”
POLS101
“ but not the ”
POLS101
“online course requires use of proctorio, which is a massive invasion of privacy.”
POLS121

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and stacked major assessments, despite occasional open-note policies.

Proctorio onlineLockdown BrowserRemote proctoringOpen notes in some sectionsMultiple midterms and finals

Assessment risk

Strict

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and short essays with study guides or quiz recycling; reviews do not clearly prove Lockdown use in the classroom.

Multiple choice plus short essaysStudy guide alignedQuiz questions reappear
“ and short essays questions which in my opinion are more about based on memorization.”
POLS101
“The questions on the as .”
POLS

Online

Many online reviews explicitly report Proctorio or Lockdown Browser proctoring; some say open notes while .

ProctorioLockdown BrowserRemote proctored examsOpen notes sometimes
“ but not the ”
POLS101
“online course requires use of proctorio, which is a massive invasion of privacy.”
POLS121
“ .”
POLS101
“ .”
POLS101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of ! She keeps the course material updated with current events, which makes it more interesting.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting organization, reading load, and proctoring. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“Dr. Haupt is an amazing professor. She provides you all the materials you need to succeed in her class and is always willing to assist students.”

📚 Reading Load

42/100

“LOTS of reading assignments. You're assigned a good 3-4 at home readings before every class”

🔒

38/100

“online course requires use of proctorio, which is a massive invasion of privacy.”

👍 Recommendation

66/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She teaches with so much passion, you see her eyes light up
  • such an organized professor
  • Her and she just reads off of them.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • To do good on them, just use A LOT of CITATIONS and you'll be good.
  • It's not just memorizing facts. We're actually talking about real issues

Theme 3

⚠️

  • .
  • She is very strict with Proctorio which was a challenge because it can glitch

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

163

Lifetime ratings

87/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews with strong online sample and multi-year , and proctoring.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 584
4 out of 531
3 out of 519
2 out of 58
1 out of 523

Course coverage

POLS10130 reviews
GLST1016 reviews
POL1215 reviews
POLS1215 reviews
GLBST1021 review
Show 3 more courses
GLST1021 review
POLS1 review
POSCI1211 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

48 reported outcomes

A range

29

A+ 4 · A 21 · A- 4

B range

11

B+ 5 · B 4 · B- 2

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

3

Not sure yet 3