AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Monika Laskowski-Caujolle

Courses not reported · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if and exams; weak sample and high dropout signal make this a risky pick.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTest heavyMandatory attendanceLittle homeworkExtra credit on boardPolarized reviews
  • Only three recent reviews exist, so conclusions are fragile.
  • and participation with .
  • One student praises her care and ; two others dropped or strongly disliked the class.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Two of three students dropped, and grading is framed as .

All evidence is in-person; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Difficulty ratings and than beginner-easy math.

All evidence is in-person; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

and participation matters.

All evidence is in-person; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

33/100

and two of three narrative reviews are strongly negative or dropout stories.

All evidence is in-person; .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Tough grader tags and ; board and a research essay can help a bit.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews available.

Workload

Light

58/100

Little or , but concentrated rather than eliminated.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews available.

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

; others say lectures underperform posted notes or call her the worst.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews available.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews and participation, with a research essay and board as boosters.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews available.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person math feels test-and-participation driven with , and little homework accountability.

Main concern

Students who need homework structure or clearer support report dropping or calling her the .

What students said

“She is the worst professor I have ever taken at ”
44855
“ but . and participation only.”
44855
“Your grade is based off exams and a .”
44855

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment centers on exams and class participation rather than frequent homework, with limited detail on proctoring tools.

Exam heavyParticipation gradeResearch essayBoard extra credit

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

as tests plus participation, with a research essay and daily board .

ExamsParticipationResearch essayExtra credit
“ and participation only.”
44855
“Your grade is based off exams and a .”
44855

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ but . and participation only.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting exam-heavy structure and mixed care versus outcomes. Credibility rating: Low.

🧪

78/100

“ and participation only.”

❤️ Care vs Outcomes

35/100

“Monika is a her students to do well.”

🚫 Strong Rejection

10/100

“She is the worst professor I have ever taken at ”

Theme 1

📝 About Assessment

  • Tests and participation only
  • Board every class

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching

  • Super nice but lectures weaker than notes
  • Long lectures with

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only three reviews, all recent and in one course code, with conflicting tone and two dropouts.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

448553 reviews

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2