AI Rate Professor

English

Jacqueline Meisel

62216ENG · ENG111 · ENG98ENG110 · ENG110 · ENG36124 · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
88.46%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Strong pick for ENG 110/111 if you want better writing and will keep up with essays and reading.

Best fit · Effort For RewardGreat FeedbackFunny And CaringWriting IntensiveFair But ToughImproves Writers
  • , and real improvement in academic writing.
  • and reading; not free but manageable if you stay on schedule.
  • A minority call lectures dry or , so effort and timely submissions matter.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many earn A grades with consistent work and feedback use, but .

Online comments feel a bit more doable; in person splits between easy-if-you-submit and .

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

multiple essays, readings, and analysis rather than pure busywork.

Similar intellectual level online and in person; in person has more lecture-style critiques.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

Many reviews say attendance is required or strongly expected even .

; online reviews rarely stress live attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

as writers and found her funny and caring.

Recommendation is strong in both formats, with a few recent in-person dissenters.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

Often fair with ; older and some newer notes also call her a hard or .

Format shift

Online leans fair and skill-based; in .

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Several essays, readings, and short assignments; not endless busywork but cannot fall behind.

Format shift

Online also reports many assignments and reading; in person adds printing and class work.

Teaching experience

Excellent

88/100

Dominant theme is passionate, funny, feedback-rich teaching that improves writing; minority find lectures boring.

Format shift

; recent in-person critiques of dry lectures exist.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

18/100

Essays and and readings supporting them.

Format shift

Same essay-centered pattern online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

29 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

, and growth as writers; a few recent reviews call grading tough or lectures dull.

Main concern

; essay deadlines and printing requirements can stress busy students.

What students said

“Super lighthearted and funny but you WILL become a better writer if .”
ENG111
“This class is an easy A if you turn everything in and .”
ENG111
“Mrs. Meisel is an . Even if she will still give you a B.”
ENG110

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and transformative with , and manageable challenge.

Main concern

Still reading and .

What students said

“3 essays and a and short writing assignments. The class was the perfect amount of challenge: thought-provoking but only mildly stressful”
ENG111
“There are many assignments and a lot of reading, but she keeps everything so . She gives amazing feedback.”
ENG110

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is essay and writing based rather than proctored multiple-choice exams.

Multiple EssaysReading HeavyFeedback DrivenOccasional Non-Essay Final

Assessment risk

Standard

60/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person emphasizes several long essays, readings, and paper-based class work; .

Multiple EssaysIn-Class Paper WorkReading Intensive
“4 papers, all on really interesting material and very little requirements regarding quotes or formating.”
ENG111
“5 long essays and a lot of article reading.”
ENG110

Online

and short discussions; no webcam or Lockdown Browser claims.

Three EssaysNon-Essay FinalDiscussions
“3 essays and a and short writing assignments.”
ENG111

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Super lighthearted and funny but you WILL become a better writer if . Very doable workload and and support.”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews (3 online, 29 in , and writing growth. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

88/100

“Jacqui is honestly one of the . I hated poetry and I was so , but I've learned so much in her class!”

📝

90/100

“ .”

⚖️

56/100

“She is a and and will answer any questions you have.”

📚 Workload Reality

42/100

“I took Professor Meisel for ENG 110. She was AWESOME!!! ... A LOT OF WORK THOUGH, like ALOT lol”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is funny af and is so kind!
  • she's hella funny
  • Her lectures can get boring because she repeats her self

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • This class is an easy A if you turn everything in and
  • Meisel is an , but she challenges you!
  • If you show up in class and

Theme 3

✍️ About Writing Growth

  • you WILL become a better writer if
  • I'm very confident about my writing, thanks to Dr. Meisel
  • she taught me how to be an academic writer

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

32 reviews over many years with and mostly consistent praise; a few sharp negatives lower perfect consistency.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 522
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG11014 reviews
ENG11114 reviews
1101201 review
62216ENG1 review
ENG361241 review
Show 1 more courses
ENG98ENG1101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

26 reported outcomes

A range

18

A+ 6 · A 9 · A- 3

B range

5

B+ 3 · B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2