AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Shawn Khorsandravan

STATS117 · MATH1314 · MATH1316 · MATH117 · MATH1342 · MATH107 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
54/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
57.14%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if and verify current course structure; experiences are highly inconsistent.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed ReviewsSelf Teach RiskFunny When PresentLecture GapsCondescending Complaints
  • Reviews split hard between funny helpful professor and lazy or condescending instructor.
  • Several students say lectures and borrowed notes force self-teaching from the book or outside sources.
  • Sample is small and older overall, so expectations should stay cautious.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

48/100

Some get solid grades with homework and Math Lab, but others warn it is not an easy A without strong stats or self-study.

Most evidence is in person; the one online review reported a B.

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

Average difficulty ratings around 3 with open-ended tests and book-based study expectations.

In-person comments drive difficulty judgments; online detail is sparse.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

; others mark skip class and you will not pass or .

; in person is mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

Would-take-again is only about half; praise and .

Online review is positive; in-person recommendations are split.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

and few graded items appear for some, while others call him a .

Format shift

Conflicting in-person reports; .

Workload

Moderate

55/100

and ; not always overwhelming but regular.

Format shift

In-person stats and .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Personality can be funny and caring, but multiple reviews criticize shallow lectures, borrowed notes, and attitude.

Format shift

One glowing online review contrasts with highly mixed in-person history.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

appear more central than projects.

Format shift

Exam and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and funny to condescending, lazy, and .

Main concern

Lecture quality and organization are unreliable according to multiple students.

What students said

“Be prepared to self teach throughout the semester because lecture and notes are almost useless.”
MATH1316
“Gives educators a bad name. Borrows notes from other professor, lack of organization, no help in class, belittles his students.”
MATH107
“Awesome funny professor! One of the ”
MATH117

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One online MATH1314 review calls him a .

Main concern

.

What students said

“Professor K is a very good teacher. .”
MATH1314

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are open-ended and tied to notes; students are told to read the book and use external help when lectures fall short.

Open-Ended TestsNotes-Based ExamsOnline Homework SystemsExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; homework platforms like Math Lab or Hawkes support practice.

Open-Ended TestsNotes-BasedHawkes Or Math Lab
“ and based off of the notes. Read the book!!!”
MATH1316
“Good teacher, a good amount of . and you should be good.”
STATS117

Online

Online .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Be prepared to self teach throughout the semester because lecture and notes are almost useless.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews (1 online, 10 in person), highlighting mixed teaching quality and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“He's awesome as a person but isn't a great teacher.”

📚 Self-Teaching Warning

40/100

“Be prepared to self teach throughout the semester because lecture and notes are almost useless.”

👍 Positive Counterpoint

70/100

“Awesome funny professor! One of the ”

🚫

20/100

“Get anyone else!! ...”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and posts notes on canvas right after class
  • lecture and notes are almost useless
  • He takes notes and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • It is not an easy A if you aren't good at Stats
  • and you should be good
  • and based off of the notes

Theme 3

⚠️ About Character Concerns

  • one of the most condescending instructors I had
  • belittles his students
  • He's awesome as a person but isn't a great teacher

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only 11 reviews with large opinion swings and several older entries reduce confidence despite usable detail.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

STATS1173 reviews
MATH1072 reviews
MATH13142 reviews
MATH 1071 review
MATH1171 review
Show 2 more courses
MATH13161 review
math13421 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1