AI Rate Professor

English

Christina Pages

ENG111 · ENGLISH110 · ENG110 · ENGLISH100 · ENGLISH111 · ENG100 · ENGLI110 · 29 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
41.67%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

Avoid unless and can match her preferred viewpoints.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough Essay GraderLecture HeavyRewrite OpportunitiesClose Minded FeedbackParticipation Matters
  • Many students call her a .
  • Classes are often lecture-heavy and boring with strict participation expectations.
  • A minority value her passion and rewrites, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Even strong writers report Bs after rewrites and heavy effort; A grades are uncommon and hard-won.

The one online review ; in person also stresses tough essays with rewrite chances.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

Readings and discussions are manageable, but content alone.

Nearly all evidence is in person; online is too thin to change the picture.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

, and skipping or leaving class draws strong disapproval.

In-person evidence dominates; as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

and many warn others to pick a different English professor.

Negative tone is consistent across the single online review and most in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

26/100

; rewrites help some students but still often land as Bs.

Format shift

Online and in .

Workload

Moderate

48/100

Several essays, journals, and quizzes.

Format shift

In person mentions four essays and weekly journals; online focuses on essay burden.

Teaching experience

Poor

40/100

A few call her insightful and passionate, but many cite boring lectures, tangents, and .

Format shift

In-person opinions are split; the online review is strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and rewrites with little mention of traditional exams.

Format shift

Both formats are essay-driven.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

28 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

insightful for some, harsh and off-topic for many, with .

Main concern

and boring lecture-heavy sessions.

What students said

“Genuinely the in my time at SBCC.”
ENG111
“She can be a but she gives you the .”
ENG111
“She is very harsh in .”
ENG111

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review reports extremely strict, arbitrary grading that drains passion for English.

Main concern

.

What students said

“She will drain any passion in the subject away with extremely strict and .”
ENG111

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is essay-centric with rewrites rather than proctored exams; friendliness .

Multiple EssaysRewrite AllowedIn-Class EssayJournalsFew Traditional Exams

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person uses multiple essays, possible rewrites, journals, and occasional in-class essays; .

4 EssaysRewrite OpportunitiesWeekly JournalsIn-Class Essay
“4 essays throughout the semester, weekly journal writing about a short story, and one in .”
ENG110
“I rewrote a , and she was never happy even though I followed her requests each time.”
ENG110

Online

The single online and does not describe proctoring tools.

Essay FocusedStrict Arbitrary Grading
“The her own beliefs in exclusion, and according to instructions that are written in a rambling and barely coherent way.”
ENG111

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You can spend 8-10 hours on each of and its still never good enough.”

Voice snapshots generated from 29 reviews, highlighting grading harshness and mixed engagement. Credibility rating: Medium.

📝

26/100

“ and is never satisfied.”

😴 Boring Lectures

40/100

“Most boring class I have ever been a part of. The entire course is just her talking.”

🔁 Rewrite Policy

50/100

“she gives you the .”

👎 Low Recommendation

36/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She will lecture the whole class which leaves no time for student participation.
  • Really makes you question where you stand on x topic.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • though.
  • I feel like the been some of but still only get 80%.
  • Easy A!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Fit

  • Very close minded and not open to alternative viewpoints.
  • If you put in the effort, and are polite, you will have no problem in this class.
  • Don't even consider her for a teacher, it will be a waste of your money.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

29

Recent reviews read by the AI

29

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-nine reviews over , but sparse recent volume and one online review limit certainty.

Inside 29 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 511
3 out of 55
2 out of 54
1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENG11011 reviews
ENG11111 reviews
ENG1002 reviews
ENGLISH1102 reviews
ENGLI1101 review
Show 2 more courses
ENGLISH1001 review
ENGLISH1111 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 1

B range

7

B+ 2 · B 4 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values