AI Rate Professor

Music

Nathan Kreitzer

MUS160 · MUS155 · CHIORVT · XXXXXX · CHOIR · MUSIC154 · VOC001 · MUS101 · VOCALTECHI · CHOIRVOLTEQ · VOCAL101 · MUSMUS · SINGINGCLASSES · CHAMBERSINGERS · MUSICALL · MUS154 · MUSCHOI · VOCALTECH · MUS162 · VTECHCHOIR · VOCAL155 · VOCTEC1 · 43 lifetime ratings

AI rating
84/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
77.78%
Difficulty
1.7

The decision

Great pick for beginner singing or choir if you will attend and , but do not expect a free ride with no presence.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyHilarious and caringConstructive vocal feedbackAttendance-based ASupportive for beginnersChoir and vocal tech
  • Most students praise a funny, caring voice teacher who builds confidence without putting people down.
  • and participation, making an A realistic if you show up.
  • A few older critiques and one recent complaint about not attending class lower the ceiling.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Many students say showing up, participating, and attending concerts or performances yields an A.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Introductory

84/100

Material is beginner-friendly vocal technique and choir work with low conceptual load.

All evidence is in-person.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

and concerts drive the grade and skipping hurts you.

All evidence is in-person.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Most students love his humor and support, though WTA is not perfect and some critique ego or structure.

All evidence is in-person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

, and constructive participation rather than harsh critique.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Workload

Light

80/100

Workload is mostly rehearsal, participation, and .

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Teaching experience

Good

83/100

Strong praise for humor, encouragement, and vocal improvement, tempered by occasional structure or ego complaints.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment centers on attendance, participation, performances, and .

Format shift

All evidence is in-person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

43 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person choir and vocal tech classes feel supportive, funny, and .

Main concern

and a few reviews report disorganization or absent instructor behavior.

What students said

“Attend class regularly and all concerts and rehearsals and you'll get an A.”
MUS160
“He's so funny and caring. He makes everyone feel comfortable and .”
MUS154
“professor does not attend his own class, very frustrating and waste of your money”
CHOIR

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Success is performance and .

Attendance-based gradeLive performancesConstructive critiquesNo traditional proctoring mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and singing performances with supportive critiques.

Attendance-basedConcerts and rehearsalsConstructive feedback
“Grade is based entirely on attendance (class is weekly for 3 hours & there is a ).”
MUS160
“as long as you are in class you should get an A”
VOCAL101

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He's so funny and caring. He makes everyone feel comfortable and . I wouldn't have picked any other introduction to singing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 43 in-person reviews, balancing strong support themes with and minority criticisms. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

83/100

“Kreitzer is an incredible educator, he is funny and kind and he is great at what he does.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

78/100

“ !”

🎤 Beginner Support

88/100

“He is excellent for you to get comfortable with singing.”

📅

28/100

“Skip class? You won't pass.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He's so funny and caring
  • gives great constructive critiques
  • Will never put anyone down!!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • as long as you are in class you should get an A
  • Grade
  • The material to learn isn't hard at all

Theme 3

⚠️ About Concerns

  • professor does not attend his own class
  • his choir on the
  • egocentric, not exactly a great teacher

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

43

Recent reviews read by the AI

43

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

43 in-person reviews across many years with consistent themes of support and .

Inside 43 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 533
4 out of 56
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MUS1546 reviews
MUS1606 reviews
VOCAL1016 reviews
MUS1553 reviews
CHAMBERSINGERS2 reviews
Show 17 more courses
CHOIR2 reviews
MUS1622 reviews
VOCALTECH2 reviews
CHIORVT1 review
CHOIRVOLTEQ1 review
MUS1011 review
MUSCHOI1 review
MUSIC1541 review
MUSICALL1 review
MUSMUS1 review
SINGINGCLASSES1 review
VOC0011 review
VOCAL1551 review
VOCALTECHI1 review
VOCTEC11 review
VTECHCHOIR1 review
XXXXXX1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

9

A+ 3 · A 6

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values