AI Rate Professor

English

Clara Oropeza

ENG111 · ENG110 · ENG200 · EGN111 · ENGLISH · ENG110111 · ENG100 · 98 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.9/5
Take again
39.02%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Avoid unless you want a demanding writing course and will chase clarity through office hours and perfect compliance.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderUnclear instructionsSlow email repliesHeavy papers and readingPolarizing English prof
  • Many students report , and .
  • Workload is heavy with frequent papers, annotations, and dense reading.
  • A and growth focus, so experiences are sharply split.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Even students who earn As , and hidden expectations that punish small misses.

Both formats call her a ; one online review claims an easy A with office hours.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

, and unclear prompts make the content feel harder than a standard intro English class.

Online emphasizes self-teaching; in-person emphasizes busywork and strict in-class expectations.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

24/100

, and she calls students out for phones or absences.

, though some online sections report attendance not required.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

and recent reviews repeatedly warn students to find another professor.

Negativity is strong in both formats; positive outliers exist online and in person.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

; students report zeros for minor misses and opaque criteria.

Format shift

and in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Lots of , and many papers dominate student reports.

Format shift

Online and and reading volume.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Some students feel inspired and supported, but many describe confusion, rudeness, and .

Format shift

; online is also mostly critical with a few fans.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Course , and participation more than balanced exams.

Format shift

Papers dominate both formats; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews frequently call her the worst English teacher for , and unhelpful communication, while some praise passion and writing growth.

Main concern

and mandatory attendance that leaves little recovery room.

What students said

“ . quite literally should not be a teacher. The ”
EGN111
“ . not to mention i spent 50 dollars on textbooks that have yet to be mentioned.”
ENG100
“Dr. Oropeza is an amazing professor. She really cares about what she teaches”
ENG110

Remote format

Online

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students often cite confusing multicolor docs, self-teaching, slow replies, and .

Main concern

, and mystery grades until late in the term.

What students said

“She doesn't post lectures, so it feels like you have to teach yourself the whole time.”
ENG111
“ and she uses so many different colors and fonts in her documents”
ENG111
“Pretty easy A if you put in bare minimum effort and show you care.”
EGN111

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment risk is and at least one report of .

Essay-heavyTough gradingLimited notes on examUnclear criteria

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and at least one restrictive exam environment.

So many papersTough graderNotes restricted on exam
“Won't turn and took our notes away for the exam because we wrote one sentence too many.”
EGN111
“ ”
ENG110

Online

Online reviews focus on papers and .

So many papersConfusing instructionsTough grader
“It genuinely takes me a few days just to get through the instructions of her assignments.”
ENG111
“she gave me a 0/40 simply because I didn't do one small thing”
EGN111

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Do not take. quite literally should not be a teacher. The when you reach out to her.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews across online and in-person formats, weighting dominant harsh-grader themes against minority praise. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“ . .”

👎 Recommendation Rate

36/100

“Trust me..find another professor!”

⚖️

22/100

“ ”

📚 Workload Reality

24/100

“She makes you turn in so .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • So many papers
  • Pretty easy A if you put in bare minimum effort and show you care

Theme 3

💔 About Student Experience

  • I did not feel welcome in her class
  • ruined my gpa.
  • She really cares about the well-being of all the students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

98

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews with substantial detail, long time span, and consistent negative themes despite a .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525
4 out of 521
3 out of 510
2 out of 520
1 out of 523

Course coverage

ENG11016 reviews
EGN11115 reviews
ENG11112 reviews
ENG1002 reviews
ENG2002 reviews
Show 2 more courses
ENGLISH2 reviews
ENG1101111 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

41 reported outcomes

A range

14

A+ 1 · A 8 · A- 5

B range

12

B+ 5 · B 7

C range

4

C+ 2 · C 1 · C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

11

Drop/Withdrawal 4 · Not sure yet 6 · Rather not say 1