AI Rate Professor

Culinary Arts

Charles Fredericks

COOKING · CULINARYARTS · CA117LAB · CULINARYFUND · CA117 · CUL · CA101 · 13 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.8

The decision

; be punctual, in uniform, and ready to learn by doing.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyInspirational ChefCaring MentorHilariousHands-On Kitchen LearningPatient and Fair
  • Students describe Chef Charlie as warm, funny, and skilled at turning kitchen mistakes into real learning.
  • Classes reward showing up on time in uniform and engaging with demos rather than textbook grind.
  • Nearly unanimous praise and 100% would-take-again among those who answered make him a standout culinary instructor.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Grades look favorable when you stay on time, in uniform, and engage; work is real but .

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Content is approachable for culinary students who watch demos and practice, though it is not effortless fluff.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

Lab culture requires being on time and in uniform; some comments say noncompliance risks being dropped.

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Every substantive review is glowing, and .

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

Students report shaming for mistakes.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Workload

Light

78/100

Hands-on kitchen work and short practical lectures dominate; textbooks are generally unused.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students call him patient, hilarious, talented, and uniquely good at making culinary learning stick.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Assessment centers on kitchen production, demos, participation, and professional kitchen habits more than formal exams.

Format shift

All evidence is in-person; no online reviews.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

13 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person kitchen and lecture classes feel welcoming, practical, and memorable, with strong demos and patient coaching.

Main concern

Punctuality and uniform standards are strict; lateness can .

What students said

“Rather than yell at you in front of everyone, he turns your mistakes into learning moments.”
CULINARYARTS
“Charlie is the most interactive, understanding, educating teacher I've ever known.”
CA117
“the only problem is either you puctual and in uniform or your dropped from the class.”
CA117LAB

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize practical kitchen performance and demos rather than high-stakes written exams.

Hands-on kitchen workDemo-based learningUniform and punctuality standards

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

85/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; professionalism (time and uniform) matters more than textbook tests.

Hands-on labsQuick demosProfessional standards
“in quick demo and all the info we need and we crank out full coarse meals.”
CA117LAB
“Just be on time and in uniform and you will be fine in his class.”
CULINARYFUND

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Charlie is the most interactive, understanding, educating teacher I've ever known. You will absolutely !”

Voice snapshots generated from 13 in-person reviews, highlighting kitchen mentorship and professional standards. Credibility rating: Medium.

🌟 Teaching Quality

96/100

“He creates a welcoming and educational environment in the kitchen.”

💯 Recommendation

98/100

“ as a teacher!! He is funny and very helpful!”

❤️ Mentorship Style

94/100

“Rather than yell at you in front of everyone, he turns your mistakes into learning moments.”

Theme 1

👨‍🍳 About Teaching Style

  • letting you work and learn in your own way
  • keeps class as short as possible

Theme 2

❤️ About Character

  • He is funny and very helpful
  • Charlie is THE coolest techer in the program
  • very patient

Theme 3

📋 About Expectations

  • Just be on time and in uniform and you will be fine
  • either you puctual and in uniform or your dropped from the class

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

13

Recent reviews read by the AI

13

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Thirteen reviews across many years are consistently positive but the sample is modest and some older comments are thin.

Inside 13 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 511
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CA1174 reviews
CULINARYARTS2 reviews
CULINARYFUND2 reviews
360701 review
CA1011 review
Show 3 more courses
CA117LAB1 review
COOKING1 review
CUL1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 1 · A 2

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values