AI Rate Professor

English

James Brausch

ENG110 · ENG11O · 24 lifetime ratings

AI rating
14/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
12.5%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

Avoid this ENG110 professor unless you have no other option and .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh GraderUnclear ExpectationsAI Accusation HeavyHeavy Paper LoadRude Communication
  • Vast majority of reviews are 1-2 quality with .
  • zeros, and frequent AI accusations.
  • Workload is paper-heavy while lectures are called rambling and unhelpful.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

22/100

An A is possible only with relentless revisions under vague, harsh standards that .

Both online and ; online adds AI zero risks.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

, and confusing directions make ENG110 feel harder than peers' sections.

Difficulty is high in both formats.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

38/100

; others mark absent for phone use and require presence despite weak lectures.

In-person is stricter on presence and devices; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students overwhelmingly say never take him due to harshness, confusion, and discouraging communication.

and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Tough-grader tags dominate; , and suspected AI.

Format shift

Harshness is consistent online and in person; online emphasizes AI accusations.

Workload

Overwhelming

16/100

Lots of , and many papers with nitpicky requirements.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

16/100

Lectures called rambling, off-topic, and unhelpful; many say he does not teach clearly.

Format shift

Negative teaching reviews dominate both formats, with a few older positive outliers.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Course centers on multiple essays and MLA compliance far more than traditional exams.

Format shift

Essay-heavy in both formats; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

17 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

with boring lectures, heavy papers, and strict phone policies, plus a few older milder takes.

Main concern

, and unhelpful or off-topic lectures.

What students said

“ and gives . Super particular in what he wants.”
ENG110
“This guys is a really bad teacher and bad person. Rude , unpolite and .”
ENG110
“It is not even worthy to go to class because his lectures sucks.”
ENG110

Remote format

Online

7 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Online students report AI accusations, zeros for , and rude emails, with only rare defenses.

Main concern

AI paranoia, zero policies, and .

What students said

“he started sending me emails for .”
ENG110
“Even if the a zero.”
ENG110
“ and has a .”
ENG11O

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment , and AI accusations rather than classic proctored exams.

Essay-heavyStrict MLAAI scrutinyHarsh late policyUnclear prompts

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and extremely nitpicky, with and strict classroom device rules.

Many papersTough graderUnclear promptsStrict electronics policy
“ and gives .”
ENG110
“Marks 10 points off if you have only one or two lines short”
ENG110
“ and you end up having to find out what to do by yourself.”
ENG110

Online

Online students face essay zeros for , and harsh resubmission demands.

AI accusationsZero for late workEssay resubmissionsStrict MLA
“he started sending me emails for .”
ENG110
“Even if the a zero.”
ENG110
“He's very particular about how essays are written with MLA formatting and if incorrect.”
ENG110

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This guy is literally the . .”

Voice snapshots generated from 24 reviews (7 online, 17 , and avoid warnings. Credibility rating: High.

👎 Teaching Quality

16/100

“It is not even worthy to go to class because his lectures sucks.”

⚖️

12/100

“A .”

📝 Workload Stress

16/100

“Instead of letting us work on the to him while he talks about politics.”

🚫

12/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Lectures rambling and unhelpful
  • teaches very confusingly and

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • he would nearly never give higher than a B for the essays
  • I'm usually an A student but withdrawing so he doesn't ruin my GPA.
  • Although his classes are tough, it is possible to get an A.

Theme 3

😤 About Communication

  • Rude in emails.
  • he sent me an , yet not telling me how.
  • Calls people who don't agree with him stupid and honestly grades unfairly.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

24

Recent reviews read by the AI

24

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-four reviews with and and in-person formats support high credibility.

Inside 24 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 53
3 out of 50
2 out of 54
1 out of 517

Course coverage

ENG11021 reviews
ENG11O3 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

19 reported outcomes

A range

4

A 3 · A- 1

B range

5

B+ 1 · B 4

C range

3

C+ 2 · C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

5

Audit/No Grade 1 · Drop/Withdrawal 3 · Rather not say 1