AI Rate Professor

Business

Julie Samson

ENT201 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.8

The decision

; students uniformly call the experience horrible and confidence-killing.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTeaching DisasterTough GraderLots of HomeworkGroup Project HellMood-Driven Class
  • Every review gives quality 1 with .
  • Heavy talking, busywork, and .
  • Students report lowered self-esteem and a course that feels improvised.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

One student still earned an A, but and miserable workload mean the A is not low effort or rewarding.

Both formats emphasize toughness; online reports a B- and harsh tags.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

22/100

Students rate difficulty very , and constant demand rather than clear skill building.

Online and in-person both rate the course as extremely hard.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

All structured reviews mark attendance mandatory with participation pressure.

as mandatory in both online and in-person ENT201 sections.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

No student says they would take her again; .

Avoidance is consistent across online and in-person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Tough grader appears repeatedly with no reports of .

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

14/100

Lots of , and nonstop talking create a heavy load.

Format shift

Homework and group-work complaints appear online and in person.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students call her the , and demeaning when questions arise.

Format shift

Quality is 1 across all five reviews in both formats.

Assessment method

Balanced

48/100

Mix of , and business-idea work rather than a .

Format shift

Reviews ; projects and homework dominate both formats.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence

In-person students describe bad moods, dumb-for-asking-questions , and pointless group work.

Main concern

Personal mood spills into class and .

What students said

“She lets her personal life affect all students, often in a very bad mood, and makes students feel dumb for asking a question.”
ENT201
“Get ready for group work for weeks in a row with unresponsive group mates, rambling stories with no end”
ENT201
“ .”
ENT201

Remote format

Online

2 reviews

Low confidence

Online ENT201 reviews are short and absolute, calling the teacher terrible with , and .

Main concern

Worst-in-college academic experience language with no redeeming detail.

What students said

“The . Terrible teacher.”
ENT201
“Horrible”
ENT201

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews ; , and tough grading instead.

Group ProjectsLots of HomeworkNo Clear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews emphasize group work and format.

Group WorkHomework Heavy
“Get ready for group work for weeks in a row with unresponsive group mates, rambling stories with no end, and entrepreneurial ideas”
ENT201

Online

Online ; they only label the course terrible with tough grading and groups.

Group ProjectsTough Grader
“The . Terrible teacher.”
ENT201

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“The . Terrible teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 uniformly negative ENT201 reviews. Credibility rating: Medium.

🚫

5/100

“ .”

😤 Mood Over Mentorship

10/100

“She lets her personal life affect all students, often in a very bad mood, and makes students feel dumb for asking a question.”

📚 Overwhelming Busywork

14/100

“Get ready for group work for weeks in a row with unresponsive group mates, rambling stories with no end”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very heavy talking, never dismisses early
  • she is literally making it up as she goes along
  • Horrible!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of homework
  • This class only lowered my self esteem about becoming an entrepreneur.

Theme 3

❤️ About Classroom Climate

  • makes students feel dumb for asking a question
  • The
  • Horrible

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Only five reviews, but they are fully consistent in tone, ratings, and and formats.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ENT2015 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1