AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Monica Dabos

STAT117 · STATS117 · MATH0000 · MATH117 · STATISTICS · STATS140 · MATH140 · STATS44 · MATH100 · 69 lifetime ratings

AI rating
51/100
RMP rating
3.6/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if you will , and use her study guides; skip if you need structure.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDisorganized but caringStudy guide equals testAccent hard for someParticipation requiredPolarizing stats teacher
  • Students split hard between loving her care and hating confusion or disorganization
  • Study guides and if you attend
  • Attendance and self-advocacy matter;

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

As are common with study-guide-matched tests and notes, but disorganization and weak structure can tank grades without effort.

In-person evidence dominates; the one online review shows harder logistics and a C.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Stats concepts are approachable for and .

; online sample does not reverse content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

28/100

Many reviews stress not missing class because participation, quizzes, and lecture content drive success.

In-person strongly mandatory; the .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

50/100

; praise for care and ease fights equal warnings to run from chaos.

In-person is split; the sole online review is a .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

Flashcards, identical study guides, late work acceptance, and help, but .

Format shift

Leniency claims are in-person; online .

Workload

Moderate

50/100

group quizzes and test focus rather than constant busywork.

Format shift

In-person mixed; .

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Energetic and caring for many, but frequent complaints of disorganization, accent barriers, and .

Format shift

In-person is polarized; online is negative on responsiveness and clarity.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

68/100

Tests and study guides drive outcomes, with group quizzes and .

Format shift

; and late grades.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

caring and test-friendly for engaged students, chaotic and .

Main concern

Disorganization, accent clarity, and reliance on self-teaching if lectures do not click.

What students said

“Her studyguides are .”
MATH117
“So unorganized and you so often.”
STATS117
“she cares about her students and makes it easy to pass if you try”
MATH117

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Single online review reports , and would not take her online again.

Main concern

Late grades and .

What students said

“Maybe she is a better teacher in person, but online she is one of the hardest professors I have had to work with.”
MATH117

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams often mirror study guides and allow notes or flashcards, which softens difficulty when students prepare.

Study guide nearly identicalNotes or flashcards allowedGroup quizzesExtra credit

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students frequently report study guides nearly identical to tests and allowed notes or flashcards.

Study guide equals testFlashcards or notesGroup quizzes
“she legit makes the study .”
STATS117
“lets her students have a .”
MATH140
“group tests, and she lets you use notes on the midterm and ”
MATH117

Online

The single online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She cares about her students and makes it easy to pass if you try”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting care versus chaos and student-friendly tests. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“So unorganized and you so often.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

50/100

“ .”

❤️ Care for Students

70/100

“Monica is by far the ! She is very enthusiastic and actually cares about student success.”

📝

72/100

“Her studyguides are .”

Theme 1

❤️ About Character

  • She truly cares about all of her students, she is a sweetheart.
  • Finally, a teacher who cares!
  • very sweet person and does care about her students

Theme 2

⚠️ About Organization

  • frazzled and disorganized, late to class 99.99% of the time
  • I spent 10 times as much time trying to figure out what the assignments WERE
  • By the end of the year there was like 15 people left because everyone dropped.

Theme 3

📈

  • study
  • Easy A if you without much studying.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

69

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

50 reviews over many years show stable polarization themes; online sample of one is weak but .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 525
4 out of 522
3 out of 56
2 out of 510
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH11729 reviews
MATH1406 reviews
STATS1175 reviews
MATH1003 reviews
STAT1173 reviews
Show 4 more courses
MATH00001 review
STATISTICS1 review
STATS1401 review
STATS441 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

15 reported outcomes

A range

9

A 9

B range

2

B+ 1 · B- 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 1