AI Rate Professor

Multimedia

Michael Gallegos

MKT164 · MAT131 · MAT153 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
27.27%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Skip unless and and strict deadlines.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough GraderUnclear InstructionsProject HeavyPolarizingLots of Homework
  • and little feedback.
  • and limited flexibility on late work.
  • and resubmits; newer ones urge avoidance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Tough-grader tags, incomplete and C-minus grades, and is not brain-burner hard.

Online reviews stress tough grading and no late grace; a resubmits.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Average difficulty around mid-level, but and unexpected coding make it feel harder than a pure art class.

Online MKT164 is called project- and quiz-heavy; if taught clearly.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

as not mandatory, while others mark it yes or participation matters, so policy is inconsistent.

Online comments ; several in-person MAT sections report yes.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

25/100

Only about one in , and recent voices say pick someone better.

; but are outnumbered lately.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

; late work is rejected and feedback is scarce when you do poorly.

Format shift

Online is especially harsh on deadlines; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Projects, discussions, quizzes, and weekly assignments add up and .

Format shift

Online MKT164 is repeatedly project-heavy; older online MAT131 notes weekly work can spike to 3+ hours.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Students describe vague answers, outdated demos, confusion in lessons, and little care for questions.

Format shift

Online quality scores cluster low; and cannot teach.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

32/100

Grade is driven by projects and .

Format shift

; some also tag test heavy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

some call him a and resubmits; others say he cannot teach Photoshop and punishes artists.

Main concern

Teaching quality and fairness feel lottery-like depending on term and medium.

What students said

“professor Gallegos ALWAYS responded to my emails, his instructions were EXTREMELY clear, and he was so helpful. He even offers you the .”
MKT164
“Professor cares little about students and artwork, and lost during lessons.”
MAT131
“This professor has no idea how to teach.”
MAT131

Remote format

Online

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, and little support when issues arise.

Main concern

and no grace for late or incomplete work can sink your grade.

What students said

“None of the and if you ask for more info he gives you a vague response, telling you to find out on your own.”
MKT164
“he is very unclear on assignment instructions and he's a if you do poorly on an assignment.”
MKT164
“I was having internet issues and was 2 minutes late to turn in a accept it”
MKT164

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews stress projects and quizzes more than proctored finals; .

QuizzesProject heavy gradingTest heavy tagged

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

rules; assessment talk focuses on projects and feedback.

Projects and feedback focused
“He even offers you the .”
MKT164

Online

Online comments highlight projects, discussions, and quizzes as .

QuizzesProject heavy
“The projects, discussions, and .”
MKT164

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you can. Pick someone better.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews spanning online and , and workload. Credibility rating: Medium.

📉 Teaching Quality

34/100

“If you want a professor who truly cares about his students, the questions they ask, and what they learn .”

⚖️

28/100

“Gallegos wouldn't accept it, I had to take another course with him only because ”

📚 Workload Load

28/100

“This course is very project heavy which makes up most of your grade.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

25/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • None of the and if you ask for more info he gives you a vague response
  • Professor cares little about students and artwork, poorly understands photoshop
  • His "lessons" consisted of him playing old videos featuring long expired versions of photoshop.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • he's a if you do poorly
  • it's relatively easy to get an A
  • if you are not interested in coding and computer science.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He is very warm, helping and respectful.
  • The professor also regularly made chauvinistic remarks about women.
  • ALWAYS responded to my emails,

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven detailed reviews from 2016-2024 with mixed but recent negative clustering give usable signal despite small sample and format split.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MKT1645 reviews
MAT1314 reviews
MAT1532 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

3

A 3

B range

2

B 2

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Incomplete 1