AI Rate Professor

Chicano Studies

Thomas Carrasco

CHICANOSTUDIES · CHST101 · ETHICS · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
48/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
45.45%
Difficulty
3.1

The decision

if you can self-pace heavy weekly writing for an easy grade and do not need active instruction.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPaper heavyEasy graderSelf-taught onlineTextbook drivenLow feedback
  • Online CHST101 is mostly readings, weekly writing, and minimal live teaching.
  • He is repeatedly called an if you submit the papers.
  • some like the content, others feel they taught themselves.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Multiple students report As for weekly papers or .

Easy-grader claims are strongest online; .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is not conceptually brutal, but and constant writing make the course feel time-heavy.

Online and and writing load.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

78/100

Most ; in-person notes are mixed but not the .

; some in-person rows list mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommend if you want an easy written GE; avoid if .

Online reviews are mixed; and strongly negative pairs.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

Students say and if work is submitted.

Format shift

Leniency is clearest in online comments.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Weekly essays, discussion posts, and .

Format shift

Heavy writing appears in both online and in-person CHST101.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Some call him knowledgeable and nice, but and barely teaches or responds.

Format shift

Online teaching presence is weaker than some older positive online notes.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and reading responses rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Assignment focus is consistent online and in person.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews split between fair A outcomes with and writing versus harsh criticism of assignment design.

Main concern

Heavy writing load and .

What students said

“Lots of reading and writing; . But to be fair, he was a and I was able to finish with an A.”
CHST101
“Absolutely horrible professor, Bases half his assignments off of amounts of unnecessary requirements.”
CHST101

Remote format

Online

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

Online students describe video or textbook self-study, frequent papers or , and limited professor contact.

Main concern

, and repetitive writing load.

What students said

“I never once spoke to this teacher. Just watched the videos, wrote the . He is a .”
CHST101
“ the beginning of the semester, and doesn't reply to emails.”
CHST101
“If I knew I would be teaching myself the entire class I wouldn't have paid money for it.”
CHST101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is writing and exams.

Weekly papersDiscussion postsReading basedLittle proctoring mentioned

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

80/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and major papers rather than described closed-book exams.

Lengthy discussion postsMajor papersReading heavy
“Lots of reading and writing; .”
CHST101
“ that goes along with it”
CHST101

Online

Online work is weekly writing, discussions, and textbook or article summaries with and .

Weekly essaysDiscussion postsTextbook readingsVideo lectures
“Just watched the videos, wrote the .”
CHST101
“1 discussion post a week plus 3 papers .”
CHST101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I never once spoke to this teacher. Just watched the videos, wrote the . He is a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews emphasizing self-paced writing, easy grades, and uneven teaching presence. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Presence

45/100

“The only time he communicated to the class was the intro video.”

📝 Writing Load

32/100

“An . He's an .”

🅰️

76/100

“ and still got A's on every single one.”

⚠️

40/100

“If I knew I would be teaching myself the entire class I wouldn't have paid money for it.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Good class but he didn't teach too much.
  • Great and educated. I liked his class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • its an easy A if you can sit down and write every week.
  • but .
  • I was able to finish with an A. .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • Lots of homework, So many papers
  • .
  • Just summarizing chapters.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven recent-heavy reviews agree on writing load and , but teaching quality opinions conflict and the .

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHST1019 reviews
CHICANOSTUDIES1 review
ETHICS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

8 reported outcomes

A range

5

A 4 · A- 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values