AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Chinh Tran

STATS117 · MATH160 · MATH117 · MATH210 · MATH107 · 20 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.2/5
Take again
70.59%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take him if and want a caring prof, but expect uneven lectures and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardCaring but unevenTest heavyLecture mistakesGenerous when clearSelf-study needed
  • Recent reviews praise him as caring and chill with
  • Older reviews slam dry lectures, constant errors, and harsh or
  • Grades are attainable if and attend, but lecture quality is inconsistent

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Homework and labs keep grades afloat, but and some call him a .

Most grade evidence is in person; the single online review reported an A- after doing the homework.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Stats and lower-division math content is doable with work, but lectures often feel dry or fast.

In-person reviews dominate; online noted a fast pace.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

32/100

and tag skip-class-you-will-not-pass.

as mandatory when stated.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

About seven in and recent chill classes, offset by harsh older reviews.

The ; in-person opinions split by year.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

and clear criteria; others tag tough grader and .

Format shift

Leniency claims cluster in recent in-person reviews.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Lots of homework and labs are common, but they also practice for exams.

Format shift

Online and in .

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Caring and patient when on form, but many describe dry lectures, board copying, and frequent mistakes.

Format shift

In-person evidence spans praise and harsh criticism; one online review was mostly positive.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

and quizzes; but essential.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

19 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

newer students call him caring and chill; older ones call lectures dry, error-filled, and .

Main concern

Lecture clarity and consistency vary a lot by semester.

What students said

“Tran makes mistakes, and , but is super laid back, makes things ”
MATH210
“he isn't the . I find myself having to ”
MATH160
“Absolutely the ! He mumbles, and literally writes his notes onto the board.”
STATS117

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One online review found him fast but ; .

Main concern

Pace can leave you behind if .

What students said

“He goes over the material kinda fast but covers the concepts pretty well. Just be sure you don't fall be behind and do the hw.”
MATH117

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are central and , but several students call them hard.

Test heavySimilar to homeworkWeekly quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

; tests can be tough but sometimes clearly outlined.

Test heavyHard testsSimilar to homework
“ ”
MATH210
“ but youll learn a lot from his class”
MATH117
“ and there are .”
STATS117

Online

; .

Similar to homework
“ .”
MATH117

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I DON'T get his low ratings? I prepared for a whirlwind, instead got the most chill math class I've taken recently.”

Voice snapshots generated from 20 reviews spanning 2015-2024, blending recent praise with older criticism. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Consistency

55/100

“he isn't the . I find myself having to ”

❤️ Caring Personality

78/100

“even tho i'm terrible at math but i love being in his class. He's such a ”

📝

72/100

“The majority of your , so attending lectures, taking notes, and asking ”

👍

68/100

“Definitely taking another class with him next year”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and helpful teacher
  • lectures are quite dry and can be tough to follow
  • He mumbles, and literally writes his notes onto the board

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Lots of homework but lots of chances to boost your grade
  • , but if you do all the homework and

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • Chinh is a caring and funny guy
  • He's rude, doesn't care, and comes unprepared for his lectures
  • such a cool and fun guy

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

20

Recent reviews read by the AI

20

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty reviews from 2015-2024 with rich detail; opinions conflict by era but sample size is solid.

Inside 20 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 55
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 56

Course coverage

MATH1177 reviews
STATS1177 reviews
MATH1074 reviews
MATH1601 review
MATH2101 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

16 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 4

B range

7

B+ 3 · B 4

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1