AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Pam Guenther

MATH117 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
58/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
63.64%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

if you can protect a large weekly study block for stats; the teaching can click hard, but the workload is brutal for a full schedule.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerLots of homeworkCaringTest heavyEXTRA CREDITAccessible outside class
  • many call her sweet and life-changing for stats; a loud minority call her the worst.
  • Workload is the defining trait, often 12-14 hours weekly with and many tests.
  • Effort plus notes and Wiley practice can produce strong grades for committed students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

An A is possible with huge steady effort, but grades also include B/B- and a withdrawal; nobody calls it free.

Online review claims good grade with effort; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Content can feel learnable with , and massive homework make it demanding.

Both formats emphasize effort; .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

and participation matters tags appear.

Nearly all evidence is in-person mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

About 64% would take again; supporters love her clarity and care while critics slam the load and experience.

The lone online review is positive; and 1-star rants.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

and understanding tone help, but deadlines are not lenient and several students struggle or drop.

Format shift

In-person comments stress no deadline leniency; online .

Workload

Overwhelming

18/100

Nearly every review cites lots of , and warnings about 12-14 hour weeks.

Format shift

Workload complaints dominate in-person; online also tags lots of homework.

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

and kindness, but three 1-star reviews call the experience horrific.

Format shift

Online is positive; in-person quality is highly polarized.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

70/100

Many low-stakes quizzes, , and EC on the final.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person MATH117 is polarizing: , but and several 1/5 horror comments.

Main concern

Heavy weekly time demand and some students found it overwhelming or dropped.

What students said

“She expects a 12-14 hour weekly commitment (including class), so IF YOU WILL BE BUSY!!!!”
MATH117
“So sweet and really great at explaining math, especially to people like me for whom it does not come naturally!”
MATH117
“Seriously the ”
MATH117

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

effort yields a good and EC.

Main concern

Only one online review and .

What students said

“Notes can be a but overall her class was great for statistics you just need to put in effort and you will get a good grade.”
MATH117

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is quiz- and test-heavy with some notecard allowance and EC, but not described as .

Many quizzesMultiple big testsNotecard on tests/quizzesExtra credit on finalTest heavy

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and about six big tests, sometimes a notecard on tests/quizzes, plus final EC.

Low-stakes quizzesAbout 6 big testsNotecard allowedFinal EC
“There are a lot of low-stakes quizzes, and like 6 big tests”
MATH117
“lets you use a notecard on test/quiz 10 points EC on finalopportunity”
MATH117

Online

Online review does not describe proctoring or book policy; it focuses on effort and .

Effort-based gradingLots of homework
“you just need to put in effort and you will get a good grade”
MATH117

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you are planning to take 4+ classes at the same time! Wonderful content, easy to learn, but .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 MATH117 reviews with one online and ten in-person. Credibility rating: High.

⭐ Teaching Clarity

72/100

“I suck at math and she explained stats in such a fantastic way that it finally clicked for me.”

📚 Workload Shock

18/100

“She expects a 12-14 hour weekly commitment (including class), so IF YOU WILL BE BUSY!!!!”

❤️ Care Factor

75/100

“ , and clearly cares a LOT about students.”

💥 Polarized Pain

10/100

“Seriously the ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Really great at explaining math, especially to people like me for whom it does not come naturally
  • This class was a huge time commitment but

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of and makes the tests super easy
  • What the actual f#@$

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • The sweetest woman ever and will help you with anything you need
  • and understanding, but don't expect leniency with deadlines
  • She is genuinely a kind person

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

80/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven recent MATH117 reviews with detailed workload notes and a .

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 56
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH11711 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

3

B 2 · B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Rather not say 1