AI Rate Professor

Sociology

Terri Anderson

SOC104 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
18/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
9.09%
Difficulty
4.5

The decision

expect , and weak communication.

Best fit · Self Taught ProTough graderInaccessibleSelf taughtAccusations of cheatingNo extra credit
  • Nearly all recent reviews call teaching lazy, uncaring, and poorly supported.
  • High-stakes essays and ; some report academic dishonesty accusations without evidence.
  • and light weekly discussions, but it is drowned out.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Even strong GPA students report scraping A- or worse; essays and .

Almost all evidence is online; the one in person review also reports struggle for A-.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Material itself is standard intro soc but , and high-stakes essays make it feel hard.

and exams dominate; in person sample is only one review.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

70/100

; and access, not seat time.

Online mostly optional; .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

and .

Online is almost uniformly negative; one positive online outlier does not shift the tone.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Tough grader tags, few graded items, no , and post-hoc failure stories define the pattern.

Format shift

Online has the harsh-grader and accusation reports; in person also tough.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

Weekly discussions can look light, but , and .

Format shift

and ; in person sparse detail.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

Students describe lazy teaching, reused lectures, ignored emails, and non-professor graders.

Format shift

Online and the single in person review both call her uncaring.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Midterm and final essays each about 20% plus short high-stakes quizzes dominate grades.

Format shift

Online explicitly test and essay heavy; in person not detailed.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Single in person review mirrors the online pattern: .

Main concern

Struggled for an A- despite being above average and felt unsupported.

What students said

“Terri Anderson was by far the .”
SOC104

Remote format

Online

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

reused materials, scarce teaching, tough essays and , and multiple cheating accusation stories.

Main concern

dishonesty claims.

What students said

“ unless you want to be harshly graded or accused for no reason.”
SOC104
“the only thing you ”
SOC104
“I do not know why Professor Anderson's ratings are so low.”
SOC104

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

High-weight essays and short timed quizzes with little guidance feel punitive rather than student-friendly.

Midterm essayFinal essayShort timed quizzesNo study guideAcademic integrity disputes

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Only one in person review; .

Tough grading
“I am an above average student but struggled to barely receive an A-.”
SOC104

Online

Online reports midterm and final essays at high weight, 4-question 5-minute quizzes, no study guides, and integrity accusations after finals.

Midterm essay 20%Final essay 20%4-question timed quizzesNo study guideCheating accusations
“the midterm and final essay are worth 20% of your grade each”
SOC104
“Quizzes are 4 questions, worth two points, 5 minute limit.”
109
“accused me of .”
SOC104

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ unless you want to be harshly graded or accused for no reason.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews (10 online, 1 in and support gaps. Credibility rating: Medium.

💥 Teaching Quality

15/100

“She couldn't care less about her students, she reuses old lectures.”

🚫 Recommendation

12/100

“ ”

⚖️

18/100

“she reopened it a month later and failed me, accusing me of academic dishonesty without providing any evidence.”

📚

30/100

“The whole class is self taught, there are only dsicussion posts each week and no study guide for the exams”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Terri Anderson seems lazy and it feels like she hates what she does
  • She will often ignore comments/emails and refer you to office hours.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I am barely scraping by.
  • it's an easy class but it's designed so you struggle.
  • Offers no .

Theme 3

⚠️ About Fairness

  • accused me of .
  • failed me, accusing me of academic dishonesty without providing any evidence.
  • She had a random person, not even a !!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

11 mostly recent online reviews with consistent negative themes and concrete grade details; one positive outlier and thin in person sample keep it from High.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 59

Course coverage

SOC1049 reviews
1092 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 1 · A- 4

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values