AI Rate Professor

Agriculture

Daniel Parra Hensel

EH109B · EH109 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Good pick if and can handle participation demands.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPassionate LecturerParticipation HeavyGuest SpeakersGroup ProjectsLove-or-Hate Style
  • Strong lectures and subject passion stand out for many students.
  • Participation, group work, and .
  • Small review set is polarized, with one strong content-agenda complaint.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Reported grades are solid and content is not described as brutal, but participation and heavy workload still matter.

Online student earned an A despite disliking content; .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

58/100

Material is approachable for interested students, with heavy but not highly technical workload.

In-person students call workload heavy yet manageable; online difficulty was rated low.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Attendance and participation are repeatedly required and central to the class design.

Both the online and as mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

Fans call him exceptional while others find him annoying or off-topic, matching a .

In-person leaning positive; sole online review is strongly negative on content framing.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

; students report solid grades with standard expectations.

Format shift

Limited grade detail overall; both formats show workable outcomes.

Workload

Moderate

48/100

, and group projects, but multiple students say it is not intellectually crushing.

Format shift

; online does not detail volume.

Teaching experience

Good

68/100

Most students praise lectures, passion, and knowledge, with minority complaints about style and follow-through.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is strong; the online review rejects course framing rather than lecture skill alone.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Participation, group projects, reading, and class engagement appear .

Format shift

Neither .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person students mostly praise knowledge, lectures, and accessibility, with one criticizing lateness and uneven attention.

Main concern

High participation expectations and .

What students said

“This professor was exceptional. He was not only very knowledgeable and excited about his subject”
EH109
“he wants participation and sets high expectations. He does not follow through and is usually late for grading”
EH109
“The workload was heavy, but nothing challenging”
EH109

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

One online review disliked perceived political framing unrelated to agroecology despite earning an A.

Main concern

Course content felt agenda-driven rather than technical permaculture design.

What students said

“his class had a very "politically correct" agenda regarding race and gender that had nothing to do with a course on agro ecology”
EH109

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews emphasize projects, participation, and proctoring details.

Participation HeavyGroup ProjectsGuest Speakers

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments highlight group projects, participation, guest speakers, and discussions rather than closed-book exams.

Group ProjectsParticipationGuest SpeakersBreakout Discussions
“His classes and he brought in guest speakers in nearly every class”
EH109
“he wants participation and sets high expectations”
EH109

Online

The single online review .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This professor was exceptional. He was not only very knowledgeable and excited about his subject but he is also just really good at presenting and being a teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting passion, participation load, and polarized fit. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Energy

68/100

“This professor was exceptional. He was not only very knowledgeable and excited about his subject”

🗣️ Participation Pressure

35/100

“he wants participation and sets high expectations”

📦 Workload Reality

48/100

“The workload was heavy, but nothing challenging”

🔀 Polarizing Content Fit

40/100

“It was a waste of time and completely turned off.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • good at presenting and being a teacher
  • has good lectures sometimes
  • I appreciate the way he relates to students

Theme 2

📈 About Workload and Class Design

  • Get ready to read
  • Group projects
  • The workload was heavy, but nothing challenging

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • He is a great professor and a really passionate guy
  • and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only five reviews over several years with mixed tones and limited grade detail reduce confidence.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

EH1094 reviews
EH109B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values