AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Lee Lchang

MATH107 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid if you need flexibility; the recent online evidence is strongly negative and data is too thin to trust the older rave.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerTough graderTest heavyALEKS heavyNo late workPolarizing over time
  • Only two reviews, years apart, paint opposite pictures.
  • Recent online MATH107 review is harsh: .
  • , and easy pass with attendance.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

and tough grading for a B-; older review claimed easy pass with attendance, so effort for a but leaning hard.

; older in-person review said attend and pass.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Recent student called busy work and ; older review called it easy for math-haters.

Online evidence is much harder than the single older in-person review.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as mandatory; older review said attending class helps you pass.

; only one review each.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

Would-take-again is 0% on file and the unless you have no choice.

; older in-person was positive but outdated.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

22/100

Tags and , and no late work credit.

Format shift

Harshness is from the online review; .

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Recent review cites busy work, ALEKS, and .

Format shift

Online review reports heavy load; .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Recent students report rudeness and lack of effort via ALEKS; one old review praised clarity.

Format shift

Online and .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

, and hard exams dominate the recent account.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Older in-person MATH107 called clear, extra-credit friendly, and easy if you attend.

Main concern

Only one old review; may not reflect current practice.

What students said

“This teacher is a badass. .”
MATH107

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

Recent online MATH107 described as inflexible, test-heavy, and unsupportive with ALEKS workload.

Main concern

, and rude email or virtual office hours.

What students said

“no favors for struggling students. 0 credit for late work, 0 make up exams”
MATH107

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and little flexibility; older review lacks exam detail.

Hard examsNo makeup examsShort exam windowTest heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring.

Attend class to pass
“If you attend class you will pass”
MATH107

Online

Online MATH107 described with hard exams, a 3-hour window, and .

No makeup exams3-hour windowTest heavyHard exams
“0 credit for late work, 0 make up exams (3-hour window), 0 understanding for students.”
MATH107

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ unless u have no other choice. . inaccessible, use of aleks reflects severe lack of effort.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews (1 online, 1 in person), highlighting a sharp conflict between recent and older experiences. Credibility rating: Low.

⚠️ Recent Online Red Flags

20/100

“ unless u have no other choice.”

📚 Conflicting Older Praise

75/100

“This teacher is a badass. .”

🧪 Strict Assessment

28/100

“0 credit for late work, 0 make up exams (3-hour window)”

Theme 1

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Plenty of opportunities.

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Support & Style

  • very rude in
  • .
  • no favors for struggling students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only 2 reviews, 12 years apart, with opposite tones and .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

MATH1072 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values