AI Rate Professor

English

Christopher Johnston

ENG111 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
28/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
33.33%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Skip if ; only risk it if you can write independently and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProVague InstructionsSlow GradingHeavy PapersUneven FeedbackOnline Only Sample
  • Two of three reviews describe , and .
  • and still recommends him, creating a sharp split.
  • High grades appear possible, but students say the and demotivating.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Students report A or A- outcomes, but only after heavy writing with and high expectations.

All evidence is from online ENG111 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

45/100

Writing load is real and , yet difficulty ratings are moderate rather than extreme.

Only online comments exist; no in-person comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

Multiple reviews .

Evidence comes only from online sections.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Two of three students strongly warn others away despite one glowing review.

All recommendation evidence is online-only.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

55/100

Reported grades include A and A-, but students still call the path to those grades frustrating and poorly guided.

Format shift

Online-only evidence; .

Workload

Heavy

38/100

Long papers and on very short poems.

Format shift

Workload complaints all come from online ENG111.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Dominant theme is that he does not , and grades extremely slowly.

Format shift

One online student disagrees and ; two others strongly pan instruction.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Course centers on papers and writing tasks rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

Online reviews emphasize papers and assignments only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Remote format

Online

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

All evidence is online ENG111: one student feels supported, while and the course feels slapped together.

Main concern

Little or and grading.

What students said

“Little to no explanation for , takes months to grade anything.”
ENG111
“He gives zero instruction for very hard.”
ENG111
“Mr. Johnston is a great teacher that and assignments.”
ENG111

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews barely describe formal exams and instead focus on papers, so .

Writing FocusedLimited Exam Detail

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

Online

Online comments center on papers and .

Paper HeavyUnclear Exam Policy
“Example 4-6 page paper on a poem that is 24 words long.”
ENG111
“ and assignments.”
ENG111

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 online ENG111 reviews with low sample size and mixed tone. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“He never really "taught" anything, the entire course felt lazily slapped together in an afternoon.”

📝 Assignment Clarity

30/100

“He gives zero instruction for very hard.”

👍 Recommendation Split

30/100

“ . USE GRAMMARLY”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Little to no explanation for .
  • the entire course felt lazily slapped together in an afternoon.
  • Mr. Johnston is a great teacher that and assignments.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload and Grades

  • Example 4-6 page paper on a poem that is 24 words long.
  • takes months to grade anything.
  • USE GRAMMARLY

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

28/100

Evidence confidence

Only three online reviews with split tone and no in-person sample, so conclusions rest on a thin evidence base.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ENG1113 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values