AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Peter Rojas

CALC130 · MATH41 · MATH160 · MATH4 · MATH095 · MATH95 · MATH120 · MATH04 · MATH150 · MATH137 · MATH130 · MATH100 · MATH107 · 93 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
41.67%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you are solid in math, will use every extra-credit quiz, and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardTough graderTest heavyLots of extra creditFill-in-the-blank lecturesPolarizing math teacher
  • and and teaching weak
  • Grades often hinge on hard exams that may not match worksheets or study guides
  • Attendance and , but struggling students frequently regret the choice

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

40/100

can push strong students to an A, but and harsh grading make an A far from guaranteed.

All evidence is in-person; outcomes swing from A+ with to D and F despite heavy effort.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Pace and concepts are often manageable in lecture, but and study guides.

In-person only; calculus and intermediate courses draw the harshest difficulty comments.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

35/100

and warn that skipping hurts, though some say he notices lateness without harsh penalties.

In-person only; .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Would-take-again is only about 42%: fans praise clarity and , a .

In-person only; recent calculus reviews lean more negative than some older lower-level praise.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

; exams can sink diligent students even when homework is perfect.

Format shift

In-person only.

Workload

Moderate

42/100

and sometimes heavy, but and many say two homeworks a week is fine.

Format shift

In-person only.

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

Some students love his slow step-by-step style and humor; many and unhelpful.

Format shift

In-person only; quality ratings span 1 to 5 with little middle consensus.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Semester grades often rest on a few hard tests, with and .

Format shift

In-person only.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

All evidence is in-person and highly polarized: and slow explanations help some, while and condescending tone sink others.

Main concern

and harsh grading can tank GPAs even for diligent students.

What students said

“He will find and Hw assignments.”
MATH130
“he gives plenty of , you can earn over 30 points of extra credit.”
MATH130
“ !!”
MATH150
“Easy A if you put effort in.”
MATH120

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are widely described as extremely hard, sometimes with unexpected material that does not match worksheets or reviews.

Hard examsTest surprisesStudy guides mismatchExtra credit quizzesNo graphing calculator in some calc sections

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person students repeatedly report tough multi-page exams, surprise problems, weak study-guide alignment, and calculator limits in calculus.

Hard examsTest surprisesExtra credit quizzesStudy guides not enoughNo graphing calculator sometimes
“the .”
MATH130
“ and the material on the exams isn't material that was covered in class.”
MATH150
“ and the study guides were of no help at all.”
MATH130

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I did all of the homework and got 100 % on it and did and show up to every class and go see him in office hours and weekend labs and I studied non-stop. He failed me near the end because he grades harshly.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 in-person math reviews, highlighting , and extra-credit dependence. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“He is a very straightforward teacher.”

📝

28/100

“ and the material on the exams isn't material that was covered in class.”

🎁 Lifeline

70/100

“he gives plenty of , you can earn over 30 points of extra credit.”

🚫

25/100

“ !!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • much
  • fill in the blanks on his worksheets
  • and will call on you in class

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Easy A if you put effort in

Theme 3

🧪 About Exams

Theme 4

❤️ About Character

  • Peter is a nice guy but in my opinion, not a great teacher
  • very condescending
  • , and

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

93

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty in-person reviews over many years with detailed grade and exam comments show a stable and .

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 529
4 out of 517
3 out of 59
2 out of 518
1 out of 520

Course coverage

MATH13010 reviews
MATH1208 reviews
MATH1006 reviews
MATH1376 reviews
MATH1505 reviews
Show 11 more courses
MATH43 reviews
MATH042 reviews
MATH1602 reviews
1201 review
1501 review
369421 review
CALC1301 review
MATH0951 review
MATH1071 review
MATH411 review
MATH951 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

10

A+ 1 · A 8 · A- 1

B range

4

B+ 2 · B 2

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

3

D+ 1 · D 1 · D- 1

F

2

F 2

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1