AI Rate Professor

Computer Applications

Dan Watkins

COMAP · COMP144A · CIS144A · COMP101 · COMAP103 · COMP144B · COMP144B61596 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
88/100
RMP rating
4.5/5
Take again
80%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

if you want support and light workload, but skim older online sections for content quality.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyClear grading criteriaGives good feedbackNo textbookHelpful and responsiveEasy Google/cloud intro
  • , and responsive with week-by-week structure.
  • Courses are light-to-moderate intro Google/cloud content with frequent As and little textbook cost.
  • One strong negative online review cites outdated third-party videos and low effort; .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Reported grades are mostly A/A+ with and , so an A is realistic without extreme effort.

Both formats report easy As; the .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Students describe intro Google/internet/cloud material as manageable and applied rather than theoretically hard.

Online and in-person both read as beginner-level computer applications content.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

and participation matters; others say optional or self-paced finish when you want.

Online reviews mix mandatory and not mandatory; .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

82/100

and help, despite one strong low-effort complaint online.

; online is mostly positive with one 1-star outlier.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

, and many As point to approachable grading.

Format shift

Leniency shows in both formats; the .

Workload

Light

78/100

as the right amount or light; no textbooks is a common plus.

Format shift

Online mentions one easy research paper; .

Teaching experience

Good

86/100

, and practical learning, with one sharp outdated-materials critique.

Format shift

In-person is consistently positive; online quality depends more on material curation.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

Comments emphasize weekly homework, papers, and applied tasks more than high-stakes exams.

Format shift

Neither .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

6 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Consistently liked as , and low-pressure with self-paced feel and strong practical learning.

Main concern

and participation can matter.

What students said

“ , and seems to really care.”
COMP144B
“The book.”
COMP144B61596
“This class is a . He is a great teacher and .”
COMAP103

Remote format

Online

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

Mostly positive intro Google/cloud classes with , and easy As; one harsh review calls content a mish-mash of outdated videos.

Main concern

Course materials can feel like linked third-party videos with uneven depth.

What students said

“ and responsive if you need help. and this Prof.”
COMP144B
“A mish-mash of videos made by others (many outdated) and links to Google Help pages.”
COMP144A
“ ! Caring and always there for his students.”
COMAP103

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

; assessment seems driven by homework and projects.

Assignment-focusedLimited exam detail

Assessment risk

Standard

70/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or proctoring requirements.

Online

Online comments focus on homework and papers; they .

Homework and paper focus
“ class.”
COMAP103

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ , and seems to really care. It was a great course and I learned a ton that I apply everyday.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews (5 online, 6 in person), highlighting help, ease, and one materials complaint. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“He is SUPER, a great teacher - helpful, patient, interested and interesting.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

82/100

“ and this Prof.”

📚 Material Quality Risk

35/100

“Professor has put minimum effort into this course. Course is largely an ad for Google.”

⚖️ Easy Workload & Grades

84/100

“Comp 103 was an easy Internet Communications class, but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • , and seems to really care.
  • ! Caring and always there for his students.
  • and responsive if you need help.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Comp 103 was an easy Internet Communications class
  • I learned so much, and it was fun - I gave all 5's, but it was work.
  • The class is set up to finish when you want.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Course Materials

  • A mish-mash of videos made by others (many outdated)
  • The book.
  • He links to videos that apply to the concept

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews span many years with consistent praise themes, but some are brief or old and one strong outlier reduces certainty.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

COMAP1033 reviews
COMP144B2 reviews
COMP144B615962 reviews
CIS144A1 review
COMAP1 review
Show 2 more courses
COMP1011 review
COMP144A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

6

A+ 1 · A 5

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1