AI Rate Professor

English

Annette Cordero

ENGLISH70 · ENG111 · ENG110 · PSY101 · ENG070 · ENGLISH65 · ENGLSIH70 · ENG70 · ENGENG · ENGLISH · ENG · ENG103 · 34 lifetime ratings

AI rating
20/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
20%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Avoid unless you have no other English option; expect heavy busywork with little teaching or .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDisorganizedPlays FavoritesDoes Not Grade PapersTalks About HerselfRude and Unclear
  • Most students , and work that never returns.
  • Many call her rude, favoritism-driven, and off-topic about personal life.
  • A and diverse in literature, but they are outnumbered.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Even hard work , and unreturned assignments.

; the single online A and APA precision.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

Content is sometimes called junior-high level, but and volume of busywork raise the real challenge.

In-person reviews dominate; and APA format pressure.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

Attendance is repeatedly listed as .

; the online review said attendance was not mandatory.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Roughly one in , and most detailed comments urge others to stay away.

Recommendation failure is concentrated in in-person English; the lone online .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

24/100

Students report , and favoritism.

Format shift

; online notes APA and reading still control the grade.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

, and group projects pile up with little return.

Format shift

Both formats mention heavy work; in-person adds constant ungraded collections.

Teaching experience

Poor

28/100

Common themes are no real teaching, personal monologues, late class starts, and poor organization.

Format shift

; one online review is only middling.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Mix of , and a final, often poorly returned.

Format shift

Online uses open-book exams plus reading; , and projects.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

33 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person English sections are heavily criticized for disorganization, unreturned work, favorites, and rude classroom control.

Main concern

You may work hard and still get a .

What students said

“ , and doesnt remember the HW that SHE assigned.”
ENG110
“ ! HORRIBLE TEACHER. GIVE STUDENTS .”
ENG103
“she's awful and does not teach ANYTHING. i learned nothing.”
ENG70

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

One online PSY , and APA grade impact.

Main concern

Heavy short-term workload and .

What students said

“ and open notes but you have to do the reading and know the material for the test questions. A lot of work for a short period of time.”
PSY101

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment blends quizzes, papers, and finals; only online clearly reports open-book exams.

Open Book OnlineVocabulary QuizzesPop QuizzesFinal Exam

Assessment risk

Standard

48/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and finals, with frequent claims that graded work is never returned.

Vocabulary QuizzesPop QuizzesPapers Not Returned
“She only graded vocabulary tests and the collects but wont grade).”
ENG103
“Beware of pop quizzes”
ENG110

Online

Online exams are open book and open notes but .

Open BookOpen Notes
“ and open notes but you have to do the reading and know the material for the test questions.”
PSY101

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ ! HORRIBLE TEACHER. GIVE STUDENTS .”

Voice snapshots generated from 34 reviews with a dominant in-person English sample and one online PSY review. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

28/100

“she's awful and does not teach ANYTHING. i learned nothing.”

⚖️

24/100

“This teacher will give you whaterver grade she wants, most likely a C despite what amount of work that you do.”

👎 Recommendation

22/100

“Do yourself a favor and !!!!!!”

📚 Workload Without Reward

32/100

“Lots of work no reward. did not dropp before the deadline.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she talks about herself 24/7
  • she should not be a college professor
  • She is really the teacher for someone who respects all different backgrounds

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • GIVE STUDENTS
  • THE
  • prepare to get B-C

Theme 3

⚠️ About Classroom Climate

  • She racially profiles people and makes discriminate remarks
  • Plays favorites
  • Absolutely rude. Will kick you out of class if you don't have a pen

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

34

Recent reviews read by the AI

34

Lifetime ratings

84/100

Evidence confidence

34 reviews over many years show strong negative consensus with only a few glowing outliers.

Inside 34 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 57
2 out of 56
1 out of 513

Course coverage

ENG10310 reviews
ENG709 reviews
ENG1103 reviews
ENG0702 reviews
ENGLISH2 reviews
Show 8 more courses
574051 review
ENG1 review
ENG1111 review
ENGENG1 review
ENGLISH651 review
ENGLISH701 review
ENGLSIH701 review
PSY1011 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

7 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

3

C 2 · C- 1

D range

1

D 1

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1