AI Rate Professor

English

Melanie Eckford

ENG110 · ENG110H · ENG226 · ENG111 · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
46/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.3

The decision

if you want to be pushed as a writer and and heavy work.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard graderPushes writers hardTest heavyMixed reviewsBusywork online
  • Many students say she dramatically improves writing but expects college-level rigor
  • Workload and tests are heavy; easy A seekers should stay away
  • Online experience was poorly received for and low involvement

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Students report , and GPA hits even when writing improves.

Both formats describe hard work; .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

Difficulty ratings and comments about Cambridge-level standards show high intellectual demand.

In-person and online both flag high difficulty; online also cites pedestrian busywork.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

22/100

as mandatory and stress participation and readings.

; online attendance not clearly described.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Some students call her life-changing for writers while .

In-person reviews are mixed; the sole online review is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

Not an ; several students note GPA pain despite improved writing.

Format shift

Strict tone is strongest in recent in-person reviews.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Tags and comments cite lots of , and test-heavy structure.

Format shift

and test heavy; online is described as thoughtless busywork.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

Passionate discussions and , but others find her unrealistic or disengaged online.

Format shift

In-person teaching praise is higher; online involvement is criticized.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

72/100

Reviews emphasize tests, papers, readings, and heavy assessment load.

Format shift

Test-heavy tags come from in-person; .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

challenge and one who felt standards were unrealistically high.

Main concern

Strict expectations and heavy testing can tank GPA despite learning gains.

What students said

“ ! She thinks that she is teaching at Cambridge and students are supposed to be on that level.”
ENG111
“This class is difficult but it will help you become a better writer. If I could have this professor for all of my English classes, I would.”
ENG226
“she isnt the but if you see her in her office hours.”
ENG110

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

One online review calls the and unhelpful videos.

Main concern

and low instructor presence online.

What students said

“ ! She is clearly not involved. She so it's hard to know if you are improving while working on the next paper.”
ENG111

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment feels rigorous and test-heavy, with little evidence of student-friendly exam policies.

Test heavyLots of homeworkPapers with slow feedback

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and tough writing standards without detailing proctoring.

Test heavyStrict writing standards
“ ! She thinks that she is teaching at Cambridge and students are supposed to be on that level.”
ENG111

Online

Online reviews do not clearly prove proctoring setup; and busywork.

Slow paper gradingBusywork
“She so it's hard to know if you are improving while working on the .”
ENG111

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This class is difficult but it will help you become a better writer. If I could have this professor for all of my English classes, I would.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews (1 online, 5 in-person), highlighting split opinions on rigor and growth. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“ ! Her class discussions are great if people do the readings.”

⚠️ Difficulty Warning

24/100

“ ! She thinks that she is teaching at Cambridge and students are supposed to be on that level.”

📝 Writing Growth

70/100

“She will defiantly PUSH you to write at a level far above what you learned in high school.”

💻 Online Experience

20/100

“ ! She is clearly not involved.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She really pushes you to think beyond what is on print
  • she makes the class interesting
  • Her lectures are very interesting and requires a large amount of student involvement

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Lots of homework
  • Test heavy
  • she isnt the

Theme 3

💻 About Online Format

  • videos of herself arranging fruit...
  • semester of thoughtless busy work

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Six reviews with mixed polarity, one online and five in-person, spanning 2011-2021; detail is decent but sample is small.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ENG1113 reviews
ENG1101 review
ENG110H1 review
ENG2261 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

2

B 2

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1