AI Rate Professor

English

Dana Drobny

PD133 · ENG100 · ENG110 · ENG111 · 45 lifetime ratings

AI rating
38/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
35.29%
Difficulty
2.9

The decision

if you want a mindful, flexible vibe and can handle vague prompts; otherwise pick a clearer English instructor.

Best fit · Effort For RewardDisorganizedUnclear PromptsCaring but ConfusingMeditation in ClassSo Many Papers
  • many call her sweet and caring while many call her the .
  • Prompts and ; grades can still be fine if you push through stress.
  • Meditation and mindfulness eat class time that many want for writing instruction.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

Many students report As and B+s, but and picky expectations mean you still work and stress for that grade.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

62/100

Content is standard intro English reading and papers, but material itself.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

48/100

and participation matters; many others report attendance not mandatory or not enforced tightly.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Would-take-again is low and recent comments lean toward confusion, stress, and .

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

appears, but and opaque end-of-term grades keep leniency only moderate.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

45/100

Expect lots of reading, multiple essays, drafts, and .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Caring and accessible for some, but frequent reports of disorganization, vague prompts, and wasted class time drag teaching quality down.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

28/100

, and portfolios more than traditional exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

45 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person English sections feel warm for some and chaotic for many, with heavy writing, vague prompts, and .

Main concern

Unclear directions and okay.

What students said

“super sweet but and ”
ENG111
“Kind person, horrible teacher”
ENG111
“ , and helpful”
ENG111

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Assessment is mostly papers and ; formal exam policy is not clearly described.

Essay HeavyPortfolioFew Graded ItemsUnclear Prompts

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and portfolios rather than clearly described timed exams.

Essay HeavyPortfolioGraded by Few Things
“We have about 8 homework assignments over the whole class, one project, and three essays”
ENG111
“Oh, and there are ”
ENG100

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Kind person, horrible teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 45 in-person reviews, highlighting polarized care versus clarity themes. Credibility rating: High.

💔 Polarized Teaching

42/100

“This was by far the .”

❤️ Caring Reputation

70/100

“Dana is an amazing woman who cares deeply about her students and about the things we can learn from literature.”

📋

30/100

“ and expects very unconventional work.”

🔁

36/100

“ ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She has no organization and takes valuable time out of class to meditate
  • Disorganized and feels like a high school English class
  • Dana gives interesting lectures

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • I got an A bc it's not a difficult course, but being in this class was infuriating
  • If you are anything short of a perfect writer, you will not receive an A
  • Lots of , and good lectures

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • She is a very kind and passionate woman who means well
  • Dana is honestly the SWEETEST teacher ever
  • values the well-being of her students

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

45

Recent reviews read by the AI

45

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

45 detailed in-person reviews spanning many years show consistent themes of .

Inside 45 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 513
4 out of 510
3 out of 53
2 out of 57
1 out of 512

Course coverage

ENG11120 reviews
ENG10019 reviews
ENG1104 reviews
345891 review
PD1331 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

22 reported outcomes

A range

13

A+ 1 · A 11 · A- 1

B range

7

B+ 4 · B 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not_Sure_Yet 1 · Pass 1